Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.

Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Thu, 03 March 2016 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34ECA1B4124 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:02:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0LIId4iwFZF for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10571B4116 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id w104so24947861qge.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:02:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=gxg1lvYPKKWJylKroRIU7+payJy/nauSXx5I6CeY1mA=; b=S8U9SZkQs+RJfPDbNjRNAyiSA8IoM4uVb2NiYW5xm8JbNgX72B87u1ckfHuEVVTi0W Vp80GewzkjV/GnawUPw/aX5azGWYOH4h8iULlCpDzyUHTEbK8GNuzZWwY3TVdnMQRusZ D0kJXyN79B/t/KXmvecUqZ028OlEWKiWgzs6KMPOVhj2sPYWvi6c/1EzFm18ke2ZZVOG IPZGQ6oSOjOEjCsGfIdM2csJEBVVTLFlInGO2JoJUasA9zrSx+YDVwZnif4AayRXMI4s mpjxdXAvo/v2XYi9R0xSPhmFKrUnxMocKSipwolng/amxtyYZ57GUsH2gS5p9Z3jG87U MtBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=gxg1lvYPKKWJylKroRIU7+payJy/nauSXx5I6CeY1mA=; b=ArmbplBcPBefDWbMjr7oxb6e7jRTcSjNjuKrJp/B7q0a9EsjTB/Bt/6JsX31cUUeSj E+zBd3Ht8wpnlx8UplI6coQWCDLyOXwzFG33LXg91B+O2rlcn53HMV8q+MlU6Mx/bgk4 RxTsw4JzhUtd17Q5dyp87/fcoie5w+dcjZ0vu8vfCvjCYw7KDPxNbbbmcgT0Ks4CskHN GtU/+77DtiE7yCScNanXfM7rc6v+s3JYxAOZS+Gwx/pPGyTOBAssX9T4ukthpcRt1yCs 2t+SegoTkYhLQosMboIEqdkwNhjzgP59oU53tfwuHP/Eogi8j1mrMByMnE2zlHPiRJhq VHxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLtYDtaU1Vy/p1Is4g5apyriMTPKwbZrtyfGKE9c3qeRZca8fsZGd+T/2VIgo6/qn6D1qVeOeTW7AMU6w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.232.211 with SMTP id d202mr5498907qhc.27.1457031719836; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.93.22 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:01:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNeeyzGa_vfovJRdoHEcTY_s4xhASCHDMt5vE6fKiZq_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMfhd9WNHqfRH=M=_B7_apJ-r43fi8qoe-+VcDkrKPwwhkPR5A@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNeeyzGa_vfovJRdoHEcTY_s4xhASCHDMt5vE6fKiZq_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:01:59 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uwDEQt0SEslqbtuUBGmYDJfmE0E
Message-ID: <CAMfhd9XmW5BVT5P33zNZEvP8jxvpoFz8VMkrWF5Bf6qseBURbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VX2FlC_0qquwUwPQab85kIwNkHs>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:02:37 -0000

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> Note: it's already the case that it's forbidden to send >1 of any given type
> of name. NSS does not presently enforce this rule but will do so soon.

(We have enforced that for a while without issues.)


Cheers

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org