Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.

"Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)" <thomas.fossati@nokia.com> Fri, 04 March 2016 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56771B3598 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 01:51:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASMtTmy1eVYA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 01:51:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 864AA1A6F6D for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 01:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id C1389A89A6BD0; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:51:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u249p67R024348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:51:06 GMT
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u249nP2v018619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:50:54 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA08.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.4.130]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:03:41 +0100
From: "Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)" <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>
To: EXT Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com>, Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.
Thread-Index: AQHRdX12Q+nwt3mZlUq33/gRSAaAQ59IzOaAgAABGACAAA1tgIAAEk4A
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:03:41 +0000
Message-ID: <D2FEFD54.60861%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CAMfhd9WNHqfRH=M=_B7_apJ-r43fi8qoe-+VcDkrKPwwhkPR5A@mail.gmail.com> <D2FEE434.6084F%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com> <D2FEE4F6.60852%thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com> <BLU177-W1A93585B8A97CF7D6DC76C3BE0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU177-W1A93585B8A97CF7D6DC76C3BE0@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.1.160122
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0BF35C5BF85B4F48B68A6957284BCE69@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/eD9MqO4VFEDzGv0gk2iLHwl8NPI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 09:51:11 -0000

On 04/03/2016 07:58, "EXT Yuhong Bao" <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com> wrote:
>----------------------------------------
>> From: thomas.fossati@nokia.com
>> To: agl@imperialviolet.org; tls@ietf.org
>> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:10:06 +0000
>> Subject: Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.
>>
>> Trying again...
>>
>>> Hi Adam,
>>
>>
>> In CoRE we might need to allocate a new SNI NameType for non-DNS host
>> names [1].
>>
>> Removing SNI extensibility would make it unfeasible.
>>
>> Cheers, t
>>
>> [1]
>> 
>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fossati-core-certmode-rd-names-00#secti
>>on
>> -3.3
>Is limiting the list to only one SNI name entry feasible?

Yes, I think so.