Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28
Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> Wed, 26 July 2006 18:46 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5oOv-0004HF-Ce; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:46:33 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5oOv-0004HA-5f for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:46:33 -0400
Received: from a.painless.aaisp.net.uk ([2001:8b0:0:81::51bb:5133] helo=smtp.aaisp.net.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5oOu-0003DE-8G for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:46:33 -0400
Received: from 247.254.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.254.247] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp.aaisp.net.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1G5oOq-00022C-OZ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:46:28 +0100
Message-ID: <44C7B93E.7020105@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:49:34 +0100
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28
References: <44C78E71.9050003@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <44C78E71.9050003@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 00e94c813bef7832af255170dca19e36
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi, > > So I've made a set of new changes to rfcmarkup, which should now > be reflected in any htmlized documents retrieved from /html/... on > the first tools server. (I haven't cleaned out the repository on > the two other servers yet - when you test this, please go to > http://www1.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4321 etc., not to www2 or www3) > > What I've done is to serve a document which doesn't have any <h?/> > tags to start with, but if the browser has javascript, I run a snippet > which adds the <h?/> tags, on the theory that most browsers with java- > script turned on will also have css which preserves the look-and > feel of the result - also with the <h?/> tags added. (I really should > add an explicit check for css capability, but I'll leave that as a > future refinement). > > Frank and Julian, especially: Will you check that the result works > for both of you - Frank should get a result which is back to what it > was before last Saturday, while Julian should get a document which > will let the Document Map plugin work, *and* preserves the look-and > feel of pre-Saturday (except for the greyed-out page header/footers). > > Let me know whether this works for you... > > This looks generally good in Firefox, but the fount size for <h1> in IE (v6.0, XP SP2) is very much too large.and is not the same as the body test for all the other headers (~50% bigger for <h2> and ~25% bigger for <h3>). Number of nits: - the sample (RFC4321) has a title which runs to 2 lines - only the first one goes into the <h1> - aesthetic rather than vital - however an internet draft with a two line title does something different (something to do with the blank line?)- see http://www1.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aoun-midcom-intrarealmcalls-00 - here the second line of the title is turned into an <h2> (and is 'sort of' left justified rather than centred - the span takes in the spaces on the left of the title words. - This draft doesn't get its headers put into <h*> at all: http://www1.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aoun-middlebox-token-authentication-00 - (an unpleasant corner case) http://www1.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aoun-mgcp-nat-package-02 has a reference to a draft file in a section title (s9) and the algorithm doesn't quite work on the table of contents (it incorporates the leader and the page number into the hyperlink).. Need a pattern that allows only a single non-trailing period perhaps? (all this was looking for a draft or RFC with a very long section title that spills onto two lines - finally found one...) - s2.8 of http://www1.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-problem-issue-statement-05 - the second line of the title isn't in the <h3> - A badly formed draft (missing the Expires: on the third line of the header) produces some unexpected results: http://www1.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-07. BTW idnits does not complain about this. I agree that the print preview selects the wrong scaling factor (80% in Firefox and 75% in IE6) - 100% would be good but I don't know if you have any control over this. Regards, Elwyn > Regards, > > Henrik > > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
- [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] RFCmarkup v1.28 Henrik Levkowetz
- [Tools-discuss] Re: RFCmarkup v1.28 Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: RFCmarkup v1.28 Henrik Levkowetz