IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fwd: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00.txt

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Tue, 26 November 2013 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A4D1AE1FF for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:58:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gG5POF7gGdtr for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:58:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (e8.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.138]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C18C1AE1FC for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:58:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from /spool/local by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <tools-discuss@ietf.org> from <narten@us.ibm.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:58:46 -0500
Received: from d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.168) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.108) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:58:44 -0500
Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3A6C90041 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:58:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id rAQDwhrn46858320 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:58:43 GMT
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id rAQDwhTB006273 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:58:43 -0500
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com ([9.49.221.66]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id rAQDwgJU006215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:58:43 -0500
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.12.5) with ESMTP id rAQDwggQ023491; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:58:42 -0500
Message-Id: <201311261358.rAQDwggQ023491@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
In-reply-to: <5294A81F.9020007@levkowetz.com>
References: <m2vbzkm31x.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2mwkrjp4z.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1311260829500.96983@fledge.watson.org> <m2li0bjn9j.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1311260840170.96983@fledge.watson.org> <m2iovfjn13.wl%randy@psg.com> <5294A81F.9020007@levkowetz.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> message dated "Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:54:39 +0100."
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:58:42 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 13112613-0320-0000-0000-000001D45CFC
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fwd: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:58:47 -0000

> But yes, it's also the case that I at some point in time said "Right, it
> might be useful for people if I filtered on the 3rd name part and presented
> that as related documents for a WG".

This is a useful feature and there are some chairs that encourage ID
authors to name drafts accordingly.

What would perhaps be useful is to add a link (or explanation) to the
heading "related active documents ..." that explains that the list is
generated entirely from the ID name, and that it may not be complete
or accurate. I.e., partly to explain to folk how the list is generated
and is thus just a convention/hueristic while also explaining what
folk should do if they want their ID to appear in the list...

Thomas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email