Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fwd: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00.txt

Hi Randy,

On 2013-11-26 14:44 Randy Bush said:
> be this true?  if so, sure came as a surprise to me.

My reference is Section 7 of http://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/1id-guidelines.txt ,
in particular the description of ID filename components 2 and 3.

But yes, it's also the case that I at some point in time said "Right, it
might be useful for people if I filtered on the 3rd name part and presented
that as related documents for a WG".

	Henrik

> 
> randy
> 
> 
> ForwardedMessage.eml
> 
> Subject:
> Re: Fwd: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00.txt
> Date:
> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:42:31 -0500 (EST)
> 
> To:
> Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
>>> >> My guess: because the third element of the filename is something other
>>> >> than "sidr".  I think the related drafts list is automatically
>>> >> generated, and I don't see a way for me/us to manually add a document
>>> >> to it.  This question is probably better directed at the tools team
>>> >> than WG chairs.
>> >
>> > this is a bit of arcana.
> Fair.  I wondered, as I wrote that reply, if this is actually 
> documented anywhere.  I think the naming convention is just a 
> tradition that the tools team latched onto ("Hey, wouldn't it be 
> helpful if we grabbed all of these pre-WG docs?"), and now the tools 
> reinforce the tradition.
> 
> Write to them.  See if that's what it is, and encourage documentation.
> 
> 
> 
> -- Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss Please reports datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb Please reports tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> 