IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fwd: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 26 November 2013 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6161ADF6D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:43:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vn7TmhJfY66H for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:43:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x235.google.com (mail-ve0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2761ADF6C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:43:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oy12so4169767veb.26 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:43:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PLlahAowMCp2Fm7EJO2sIk+bvgmn3Px8PO5f02pOxwA=; b=itmzm8Rf1S4cVlIo8WoWhia74/B8jYS5tzuLiLQ57SOaI9zRJzExPWBsXpGxwKJhW2 A2qHMSIDRXAjbamDILn9DaziTXuksLe5QvAoyPrWCcjNYMOjTylOfHlw1w4Jibee2LW3 JK+KKVoI3b0qdY/PuuX/6Unu+y1xsk5kthtDMNKx//5tz/+IzZ5QpO7xa8nY4i2qmqHb fAq0m8C7jXTydMHEw67ppPtdgR8ZViHpxFmwD+eFqcu+pZPCJdr/Ulo+9NrK3M8hdUaF yvvUwNUC6ddmGLLtHFyEvEcRrM1SmvU4S9aXVWclmBrjLTFfp3ntpAj+wpCoKwCWBdjC cmrQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.75.34 with SMTP id z2mr10147vev.57.1385487812218; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:43:32 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.170.71 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:43:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201311261406.rAQE67xe024626@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
References: <m2vbzkm31x.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2mwkrjp4z.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1311260829500.96983@fledge.watson.org> <m2li0bjn9j.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1311260840170.96983@fledge.watson.org> <m2iovfjn13.wl%randy@psg.com> <5294A81F.9020007@levkowetz.com> <201311261358.rAQDwggQ023491@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <m2eh63jm73.wl%randy@psg.com> <201311261406.rAQE67xe024626@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:43:32 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4tod331MPDN2mgzBpCXXeQprz6Q
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVAt50XFABP80fhX4_iFdkaKxA8jJCGzgfxvZOEK2vWZ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fwd: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:43:33 -0000

>> i would think that the wg page maintainers would be able to add
>> documents to that section which did not have magic names.  it is
>> "related documents" not "magically named documents," and i can envision,
>> for example, the foo wg thinking a bar wg document was related.  but i
>> think the bikeshed really should be magenta.
...
> One other problem with "related documents" is that I can think of more
> than a few documents that authors would claim are related to 1/2 dozen
> WGs or more... Could quickly get out of hand...

It could, but that's where it would be nice if the chairs could
control it.  It's fine for the default to be that documents with the
wgname as the third token are put in the list by default, but it would
be really nice if the chairs could:
1. add other documents that they consider to be related, not requiring
the authors to artificially rename the doc and *allowing* a doc to be
related to more than one WG, and
2. toss docs out of that list -- just because an author wants it to be
related doesn't always make it so.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email