IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fwd: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00.txt

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Tue, 26 November 2013 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50E21AE222 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 06:06:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGyXw_cSlIrl for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 06:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com (e37.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBF91AE1F4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 06:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from /spool/local by e37.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <tools-discuss@ietf.org> from <narten@us.ibm.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:06:14 -0700
Received: from d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.177) by e37.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:06:13 -0700
Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13441FF001A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:05:52 -0700 (MST)
Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id rAQC4NOj64946246 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:04:23 +0100
Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id rAQE98M3011565 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:09:08 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com ([9.49.221.66]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id rAQE96vk011414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:09:08 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.12.5) with ESMTP id rAQE67xe024626; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:06:07 -0500
Message-Id: <201311261406.rAQE67xe024626@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <m2eh63jm73.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <m2vbzkm31x.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2mwkrjp4z.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1311260829500.96983@fledge.watson.org> <m2li0bjn9j.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1311260840170.96983@fledge.watson.org> <m2iovfjn13.wl%randy@psg.com> <5294A81F.9020007@levkowetz.com> <201311261358.rAQDwggQ023491@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <m2eh63jm73.wl%randy@psg.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> message dated "Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:02:08 +0900."
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:06:07 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 13112614-7164-0000-0000-000003AE7F07
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fwd: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:06:18 -0000

> i would think that the wg page maintainers would be able to add
> documents to that section which did not have magic names.  it is
> "related documents" not "magically named documents," and i can envision,
> for example, the foo wg thinking a bar wg document was related.  but i
> think the bikeshed really should be magenta.

:-)

One other problem with "related documents" is that I can think of more
than a few documents that authors would claim are related to 1/2 dozen
WGs or more... Could quickly get out of hand...

Thomas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email