Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list

Bob: Not sure if inventing new dedicated groups / status ("inactive") is going to be very helpfull.

We already have descriptions for groups, and thats why i was sugggesting that simply updating the statuses of groups is IMHO most flexible - in many cases you want to redirect new trafic to othrer groups for example. How ? Just write it into the group description...

Cheers
    toerless

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:48:36AM -0800, Bob Hinden wrote:
> 
> > 
> >> When/how/if to delete them is above my
> >> pay grade.
> > 
> > ???Deleting??? would be wrong (we need the archive).
> > Even ???closing??? would be questionable ??? recently, the ROHC list turned out to be useful after two years of silence.  There was a bit of a hiccup when IAB decided to close some lists???
> 
> Perhaps move them to an inactive page, I agree important to keep the archive.   Might also be good to put them in moderated mode to make it hard to spam people.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 

> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de