Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 19 November 2020 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFBF3A0AE5 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:49:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A5rIUjKrcInk for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5C9F3A0A25 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C138E54843F; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:49:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id B7E4F440059; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:49:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:49:50 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20201119194950.GR39343@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <A23BCAC1-51E6-49DC-AC0B-52D4C08D5027@tzi.org> <16561.1605784069@localhost> <B2E04650-8B9C-44F9-A425-F02B258D6E46@tzi.org> <20201119172021.GN39343@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <7838A4AA-3D2B-4BD5-826D-BC33B0EB34AD@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7838A4AA-3D2B-4BD5-826D-BC33B0EB34AD@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/eSl34kmcChni-LcrXOmW8IorZIo>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:49:58 -0000
Understood. IMHO, what i was asking for is also primarily better visibility. Owner of list could be entered informally into the description, and changelog shuold be standard IMHO on stuff like this On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:46:20PM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On 2020-11-19, at 18:20, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > > > > Each list should have: > > > > a) A visible "owner" of the list. Whatever that is (IESG, IAB, any other "org", individual) > > > > b) A history of the description of the list with who and when the description was changed. > > > > That would allow for anyone getting to what looks like a stale list to do a bit more of an > > educated guess whats going on with the list. > > > > From then on out, we could determine if therer should be > > > > c) a trigger to the owner to update the list after some type of event, such as: > > c.1) There was no mail to the list for 1 year > > c.2) The description was not changed for 5 years. > > I wasn???t asking for more process, just for a better display of the list. > > Grüße, Carsten -- --- tte@cs.fau.de
- [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list Bob Hinden
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Non-WG lists list Toerless Eckert