IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Important dates in upcoming.ics

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 09 February 2021 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EEE3A0D5C for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:51:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id feZaZBhIUo9p for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:51:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3740B3A0D52 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:51:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD78138A45; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:54:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vhwY3bZKVyL6; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:54:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A06238A3E; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:54:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96EF34A; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:51:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Cindy Morgan <cmorgan@amsl.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <2EF86551-5EAD-4E29-9E92-B58D5E44B322@amsl.com>
References: <7da79bcd-2931-4a0e-8f7e-3ba528fea0cc@nostrum.com> <20268.1612372060@localhost> <cac83fb6-2cbd-5037-e6d7-623d4e2c30b1@nostrum.com> <947.1612405162@localhost> <15ea5446-3f90-b3bf-f10e-d3e5b58592fc@nostrum.com> <28578.1612905766@localhost> <2EF86551-5EAD-4E29-9E92-B58D5E44B322@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:51:34 -0500
Message-ID: <16150.1612907494@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/e3UqPvz2QzAFkid_eg0pk70m2kE>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Important dates in upcoming.ics
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:51:43 -0000

Cindy Morgan <cmorgan@amsl.com> wrote:
    >> I thought that the last conversation we had between you, I and Ines, that
    >> IoTDIR was not configured in the right way to do this. Did that change?
    >> Maybe we just need to remind them again.
    >>

    > This actually came up today with IOTDIR. The chairs can’t schedule a
    > meeting themselves—it looks like they can, but then it doesn’t actually
    > work for them. However, from playing in the sandbox, the Secretariat
    > can schedule interim meetings for Directorates.

Ah.

    > That said, when we got the request from Ines, we (Secretariat) checked
    > with the IESG, and the IESG would prefer to not have Directorate
    > meetings listed in the public calendar (and have the invite go to
    > IETF-Announce), since those meetings aren’t open to everyone.

I see.
IOTDIR is now open. (IOT-Directorate wasn't. Or have I the names swapped)

But, the point of having meetings in a calendar is so that people don't get
double booked.  It seems that maybe we need to be able to mark the meeting as
more private, so no meeting info is put in the calendar.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email