Re: [Tools-discuss] another case of links not updating

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 06 May 2020 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AC93A0B00 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 13:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.404
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.404 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.275, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PxLNjmwkQ6IJ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 13:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5DA63A096A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 13:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 046KZJHj020632 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 May 2020 15:35:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1588797320; bh=XexF5y50WcJcOTPqIR4Nyy3hqD6StLFNsXKf5rROPr8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=GTeGA9v7pTSXcaaqDh/viHxuEnvWnr0J6usy/VQSxbs3VL4HmGeO39xYV0/DptKCU ozwlvu6ZdHxO1IVDiHQQNp5YaNCNiHfm1qZlgOPjyH1cgOv+OHrnp+yxwFsTbPLkFq JaTe8c8lZUY7/kZ+X92xevGM98tMp/Ju57LN2qkM=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2005061024040.16512@bofh.nohats.ca> <d538a7da-8e90-cf26-3c39-b0dd5b2241b9@levkowetz.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.2005061352200.20509@bofh.nohats.ca> <ae0875b4-13b6-387a-df7a-f157e39c1992@nostrum.com> <B8FBCD91-94F2-414F-B34C-1296F5552304@tzi.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <cfc7d4e8-e5d2-99da-b041-b02b565f7db6@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 15:35:19 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B8FBCD91-94F2-414F-B34C-1296F5552304@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/mubaODMjWrxI01qaKnY_Bahzt-E>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] another case of links not updating
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 20:35:24 -0000

On 5/6/20 3:31 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
>> On 2020-05-06, at 20:15, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>
>> The datatracker doesn't have this problem.
> That is good to know.
>
> Paul’s insistence on a fix is also an indication that we continue to rely on the tools server.  Its format for presenting RFCs, and the links that point to it, are still widely used by many people, inside and outside the IETF.

Yes, and it is on the plan to have the datatracker html-ized view use 
the same style (the content is already essentially the same).

I understand that there are a lot of places that point into tools.ietf.org.

>
> Grüße, Carsten
>