[Tools-team] Re: Language review of draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-08; Section 8.4, WG Flag

On Mon, 2005/04/18 (MDT), <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:

> Hi again, Alex,
>
> In response to the recent comments on the draft, as a clarification,
> I'd suggest replacing this text in section 8.4:
>
> OLD:
>
>    WG flag: True for WGN drafts and false for all other drafts.  For
>       example, "true" for "draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-13".
>
> with
> NEW:
>
>    WG flag: True for WGN drafts and false for all other drafts.  For
>       example, "true" for "draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-13".  This flag
>       only influences the further handling of initial ( -00 version )
>       draft submissions.

It would be better if the added sentence explicitly limited its scope to
"this document" or somesuch. It is possible that WG flag will influence
more than just 00 submissions, eventually. While we may need a better
scheme to set the flag or extract WG ID, the notions of a "WG flag" and
"WG ID" are sound, IMO.

Said that, I would not object to your wording even it is added "as is".

Thanks,

Alex.

_______________________________________________
Tools-team mailing list
Tools-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-team