[Tools-team] Re: Language review of draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-08; Section 8.4, WG Flag

Hi Alex,

On 2005-04-19 12:48 am Alex Rousskov said the following:
> On Mon, 2005/04/18 (MDT), <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi again, Alex,
>>
>> In response to the recent comments on the draft, as a clarification,
>> I'd suggest replacing this text in section 8.4:
>>
>> OLD:
>>
>>    WG flag: True for WGN drafts and false for all other drafts.  For
>>       example, "true" for "draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-13".
>>
>> with
>> NEW:
>>
>>    WG flag: True for WGN drafts and false for all other drafts.  For
>>       example, "true" for "draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-13".  This flag
>>       only influences the further handling of initial ( -00 version )
>>       draft submissions.
> 
> It would be better if the added sentence explicitly limited its scope to
> "this document" or somesuch. It is possible that WG flag will influence
> more than just 00 submissions, eventually. While we may need a better
> scheme to set the flag or extract WG ID, the notions of a "WG flag" and
> "WG ID" are sound, IMO.
> 
> Said that, I would not object to your wording even it is added "as is".

Ok, so what about:

NEW:

    WG flag: True for WGN drafts and false for all other drafts.  For
       example, "true" for "draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-13".  This flag
       only influences the further handling of initial ( -00 version )
       draft submissions, as far as the current document is concerned.

Henrik

_______________________________________________
Tools-team mailing list
Tools-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-team