Re: [Trans] AD Review: draft-ietf-trans-gossip-04

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 08 November 2017 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D825B126DEE for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:35:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLN-XXmhMamE for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73AE012940E for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:35:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id a192so2933118pge.9 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:35:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=ecox6v8t4GwY+vtxLyNYiYJH4toemPoiVP4tdix34jc=; b=Mx+AbNyi5gRPHXRoasrEDC3QtYTL/hF0hx8FOS8urghW5wcQeq5ok8xzaNKyN8krjk fN64HjlNx+hNCZDg6C8haXNIgJgtUqsC2wgjMFA5OAz8OxQ7OVHRUWVwuSj6+uGKIvrz wctYi399ltBXDOyxfLUT49FPNX4TEa0OxpkOrsWrK+k3p1wQL8Aq02uKn+yUvmSQ9ION NlcWmKKuW1ujmYuINEXdSJj3FMxboj/K0n9HKVMR8lcLr2sLH5KhORU+ooyxEv3ZCubD mWR/LuczaJqNLdVd78Cfl8tlooCTsRt/PFsYKuQ4/KLzsVfdJRxkZk8m9tqeBSqvtj77 kKSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ecox6v8t4GwY+vtxLyNYiYJH4toemPoiVP4tdix34jc=; b=mdm15CDQs9WNbobLgDJqFpb3y9Q3+K76bPuhgVv0Ig1B2xE9hFgl/goy3wJs6oB+0+ +2DNzsZawZXRlyXyfUsGTG+Vlw74THt4AnOqCd14AUaX3qo1fe8H9GVmSN5TiSWJDSgp 98nAVy5z1yprkyipu6aM49bm3B1V8WWst2//VWKkiOWoZlZHqZJ2tjVXvFvmXHNVZotL I7+sHAN85N2vKC9xHG9wUfkW0WTpNMePS2TCJYbCE8hKmpSTyCs6WzcUlry44K9qD1ts 5jDn0HCxby5FYyosAqWx40wXcZNZTsG2VEgt3H/IdLnlBIhLUMkK+e1RoaXV0cdL2y7d wl+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4cjuwuoh+JouCmnx3Tlls0GjqM0sPEDnPDJHQ9BRLJxYGRPStZ SQIav65PWo439Dpmy+DBdf3Pug==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+T2WSf2KD2P4jMqIbdBPWtERoPt6ANAft9JuxYkXBai9W6EmgKu3OhQ5FtF3ZkEFsF61RwHpQ==
X-Received: by 10.101.93.140 with SMTP id f12mr1755194pgt.60.1510176906556; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aspen.local (209-112-147-75-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [209.112.147.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r67sm254855pfi.56.2017.11.08.13.35.05 for <trans@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:35:05 -0800 (PST)
To: trans@ietf.org
References: <CABcZeBM6=26ojcoMfkq5205z7UvCSQuhkg0PrR2_bjP-ps7W0g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgSyB4bdjJs=iGsQFmuwPZoQTTjhrwu=ivL5rBB7EWOjNw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71n2egvMpi_CdLpnFxPx1coFdV9dF2Zh9H0Y17qB4ZwOhA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d340499b-1d60-a2c4-5aa2-24e634afedc8@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:35:00 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+cU71n2egvMpi_CdLpnFxPx1coFdV9dF2Zh9H0Y17qB4ZwOhA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Lrm1Suq8pWnjaF6PGClLs2HuDI9rFcrQ7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/0CVZBUZiDMt9ZeH6xGjzVy-Iy6w>
Subject: Re: [Trans] AD Review: draft-ietf-trans-gossip-04
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:35:52 -0000

On 11/8/17 12:24 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> With regards to Richard's suggestions: we intend to rev the doc to
> address all of the minor and major issues as adequately as we can. We
> aren't very excited about refactoring the document entirely though. If
> the group thinks it's valuable mostly as-is, we'd be happy to see it
> published. If the WG thinks it would be better to refactor it, strip
> out major components and so on - we think that'd be a valuable effort
> and would be happy to comment and provide feedback.

Thanks, Tom.  We'll spend some time during the meeting
discussing this and take the results of that discussion
to the mailing list.

Melinda