Re: [Trans] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E811B3A07D7 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QWJHioU_1YHA for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A722B3A07D4 for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id y9so8917708iox.2 for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Yi0APyE+gAGmuXMqHgdm+cn8V22BtnXjPJD9EqtdbIk=; b=JGpHCZP7+KHPJuuTTBvOJI1dBQVvTUAoGX7xCLap1RAUg2bgrC/qMLFbj6qpFDQ6iJ JP33W20huzxPTQCuo4iw6FOt9leEa10Wka6wOB70nqIqsxuj277C6pKzmfSx+YpNMpQD gP02t8MkyPikjAWn67YZKt3TBtCNSi6m8VusZuz61TDtvVg3DfwXEbSzjr9m/SEFPIYp Bki76Py2T24unb4vBztLsG+g4lerY2EdJo+NV4CM+nOUuUxI2/qJOHWpWvJqU3hJINJn vvoU/L45t2c9QcE1ph5/8exHmSMnGFldynI6zUoTBqHQaXD4fWlYS/8UL+gccbjmmS63 6o/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Yi0APyE+gAGmuXMqHgdm+cn8V22BtnXjPJD9EqtdbIk=; b=iH5PRaXWoY6lhSTB0g0U7nUbhqPNKWHiWOlvb/a4DhIEONNCG2ELOapmNQS8ANzDsF AMS4ytgTY4gdy57ls4/a/WafnrdHn7xyjz/IgL7wzafZxhWVM29SJs2LmsBmj/Zkr2cz 8GwG5ky2QjYfSFzzP8ANLjoZ547ywS41vBUpdEQGGu4deROTnqo4ezO5RPfF0UMAPCvN NY0XAeLyk2ZIG7i7FFswxyhMoG+aW35qhVO6BXOdXSEM7DG+AZs/oMsVds2BKZfSmuSR xQOQphAb4Sc04cj4IJSa+Gf38CWI6lBs5+p9OQTo7bOtMhO1YvPzckYdUVVyexLbzaH8 sVZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZlL0/Y30sYYJTXTqNOoVtZkS1hCpeWWQj47692WU6otUVZh/8 7FS8wd3450E7ur0usI0QNl2EMj3/dOSz6OLm7cQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmU7+IY1KMNhzIAnxZsF2UbkUuupTybwERu3vpR/GFAZs6sblzvIS/qfoosG/asrfg12oGJDGR1mJuDL7Gnl4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2245:: with SMTP id o5mr5787683ioo.20.1627593594801; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <97FC6C54-5642-4E0B-B6CB-F3231C58D7AF@akamai.com> <CAErg=HG3-TT++aU6mRQ7uyp_d0gLbUWU-3qVBzZ7fdAzHthtPA@mail.gmail.com> <C6F3ECDF-D16A-4BFC-BBF5-14F6577D26D2@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6F3ECDF-D16A-4BFC-BBF5-14F6577D26D2@akamai.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:19:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxQYjwgzPibr7v10txvuagzNzMei=rYUBFbZaXq4XKrwnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000e969d05c849aa3d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/7xS7fk63NthZgF467jh6bUjlI8M>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-39: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 21:20:01 -0000

Hi Rich,

I was almost sure we had this exchange, and yet I can't find it in my email
archives. Anyway:

Regardless of the outcome of this LogID discussion, I do not object to you
making changes (or not) as you see fit, having considered my comments.

Thanks for the response
Martin

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 2:15 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

>
>    - I'm not sure this is correct, Rich? Logs regularly rotate IDs;
>    presently annually, but it's reasonable to anticipate more frequently as
>    the size/performance tradeoffs, precisely as the way of pruning the storage.
>
>
>
> Thanks for the correction!
>
>
>
> So how do replying parties know the log ID changed?  And do we need to
> give Log’s not an ID but rather an arc?
>
>
>