RE: TRIGTRAN Security Considerations (was: RE: [Trigtran] TRIGTRAN Nextsteps ("let the games begin"))

Hi Spencer,

So, cutting to the chase:

> So, I think the short answer to John's question is, "yes, 
> that's exactly the kind of thing I'd hope TRIGTRAN triggers 
> would be used for."

Good, I think that would be a useful thing for TRIGTRAN to work
on.

thanks,
John

> 
> Spencer
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: john.loughney@nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney@nokia.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:11 AM
> > To: Spencer Dawkins; trigtran@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: TRIGTRAN Security Considerations (was: RE: [Trigtran]
> > TRIGTRAN Nextsteps ("let the games begin"))
> > 
> > 
> > Spencer,
> > 
> > Quick question - in a number of wireless networks, there can 
> > be spurious time-outs
> > due to radio unavailability (or bad layer 2/3 coupling).  
> > Quite often, this can 
> > kick-off a chain of events, along the line of time-out -> tcp 
> > abort -> application 
> > protocol tear-down, security association tear-down.  Can 
> > TRIGTRAN also be used to 
> > prevent unnescessary tear-downs (a sort of - hold on, don't 
> > disconnect quite yet 
> > message)? If so, your text below might need to be updated slightly.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > John
> _______________________________________________
> Trigtran mailing list
> Trigtran@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trigtran
> 
_______________________________________________
Trigtran mailing list
Trigtran@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trigtran