Re: [Tsvwg] Re: AD review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Fri, 05 October 2007 00:34 UTC

Return-path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Idb9T-000852-93; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:34:47 -0400
Received: from tsvwg by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Idb9R-00082T-93 for tsvwg-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:34:45 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Idb9Q-00082K-Tg for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:34:44 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.173] helo=mgw-ext14.nokia.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Idb9Q-0006k8-Dl for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:34:44 -0400
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext14.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l950YAla027575; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:34:11 +0300
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:34:10 +0300
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:34:09 +0300
Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:34:09 +0300
Received: from [64.134.35.236] (daec-linuxvpn058183.americas.nokia.com [10.241.58.183]) by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l950XNMK010509; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:33:25 +0300
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20071004174510.048b8b00@pop3.jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <BDCEEBF6-3405-4729-97A0-A447B8E1FF4F@nokia.com> <46AF4DB6.6000304@ericsson.com> <46DECF4D.9080006@ericsson.com> <4B38544B-D006-4110-90A3-39B13836090C@nokia.com> <811AD799-26F9-4B21-A673-2F3ABAF4EECD@cisco.com> <71FD3EB9-9BA6-491D-AF8B-28DC349958DA@nokia.com> <96A274F4-53FB-4EEB-96D8-2716234F7CF8@nokia.com> <A26E6A77-03D4-4DA6-84D9-C80FE64001DA@cisco.com> <BDCEEBF6-3405-4729-97A0-A447B8E1FF4F@nokia.com> <5.2.1.1.2.20071004174510.048b8b00@pop3.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-15-636318788"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Message-Id: <59760EE9-4FA6-4C03-9F06-647A9B31377A@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Re: AD review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:33:19 -0700
To: ext Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2007 00:34:09.0138 (UTC) FILETIME=[717E6520:01C806E7]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d0bdc596f8dd1c226c458f0b4df27a88
Cc: tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

On 2007-10-4, at 9:48, ext Bob Briscoe wrote:
> In the appendix on PCN, we changed terminology. The PCN w-g have  
> agreed to use the term 'flow termination', not 'flow pre-emption',  
> which avoids raising unnecessary concerns with the US regulator  
> because in the US pre-emption implies one flow pre- empting  
> another, which isn't allowed, while we mean what they call flow  
> termination, which is allowed when capacity is unavoidably
> reduced.

Thanks for the notice - I think that's a good change to make.

Lars