IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tsvwg] AD review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Tue, 11 September 2007 09:41 UTC

Return-path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IV2F9-0000I4-Ea; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:41:15 -0400
Received: from tsvwg by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IV2F8-0000Hn-AX for tsvwg-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:41:14 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IV2F7-0000Hb-Uj; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:41:14 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IV2F7-0006ox-DI; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:41:13 -0400
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext11.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l8B9exGt004951; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:41:11 +0300
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:40:48 +0300
Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:40:46 +0300
Received: from [172.21.37.167] (esdhcp037167.research.nokia.com [172.21.37.167]) by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l8B9ejgi003200; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:40:45 +0300
In-Reply-To: <46DECF4D.9080006@ericsson.com>
References: <46AF4DB6.6000304@ericsson.com> <46DECF4D.9080006@ericsson.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-62-743043145"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Message-Id: <4B38544B-D006-4110-90A3-39B13836090C@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:40:40 +0300
To: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls@tools.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2007 09:40:46.0550 (UTC) FILETIME=[D45C4F60:01C7F457]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 31247fb3be228bb596db9127becad0bc
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [Tsvwg] AD review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

I reviewed draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls, and think it is ready to move  
to IETF last call, modulo a resolution to some small issues:

(1) Section 8.3 doesn't really discuss an "example use", which is  
what the title of Section 8 is. Suggest to cut it or move the content  
elsewhere.

(2) I'd make sense to swap Sections 8 and 9, i.e., discuss deployment  
considerations before example uses.

(3) My recollection was that there was an agreement to move the  
discussion of how one would use this to support PCN to an appendix.  
Some of this has happened, but Section 8.4 still exist in the main  
body of the document, and is longer than all the other example uses.  
I suggest to replace the content of Section 8.4 with a pointer to the  
appendix, and move the PCN details there.

(4) Can the reference to [Briscoe] be made more concrete, i.e., can  
it point at something that people can actually get at?

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email