[Tsvwg] RE: WG Last Call: three draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01 documents (fwd)

Gentlemen,

This is a good document, I am glad to see this kind of document
being worked on.  I understand that this must have been a huge
undertaking, but I have some very quick requests.  Could you improve
the ToC, for example, listing the RFCs as subsections?  Also,
the formatting of the document is confusing - I believe that
all paragraph text should be indented - which it is not; however
text copied from existing RFCs should probably be doubly indented
(it is currently indented a single time, for example in 3.3.1)

I hope this is not overly nit-picky, but my first attempt at 
reading this document was not successful as the current formatting
got in the way of understanding what is being discussed.

thanks,
John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Pekka Savola [mailto:pekkas@netcore.fi]
> Sent: 22 August, 2003 11:09
> To: tsvwg@ietf.org
> Cc: bob@thefinks.com; Soininen Jonne (NET/Helsinki);
> andreas.bergstrom@hiof.no
> Subject: WG Last Call: three draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01 documents
> (fwd)
> 
> 
> FYI;
> 
> Your oxen are being gutted and you're invited to the bloodfest.
> 
> In other words..
> 
> Feedback & Review is sought.  Please take a look at the 
> transport IPv4 
> survey document:
>                                                               
>                                      
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4surve
> y-trans-01.txt
> 
> It's not too long; please send feedback.  In particular, it 
> would be good
> to identify specifications which have incorrect information, or
> specifications which are not longer relevant and could be moved to
> historic (if someone bothered to do that, but that's a 
> different topic),
> or the like.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Pekka, Jonne & Bob
>  v6ops co-chairs
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:38:49 +0300 (EEST)
> From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Cc: bob@thefinks.com, jonne.soininen@nokia.com, 
> cesar.olvera@consulintel.es,
>      andreas.bergstrom@hiof.no
> Subject: WG Last Call: three draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01 documents
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a WG Last Call for comments on sending the following the next
> three "Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Standards"
> documents to the IESG for consideration as Informational RFCs:
> 
> Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Routing 
> Area Standards
>   
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-routing-01.txt

Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Security Area Standards
  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-sec-01.txt

Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Transport Area 
Standards

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-trans-01.txt

Please review these documents carefully, and send your feedback to the
list (editorial modifications may also be sent to the editors, Cesar for
the first, Andreas for the other two).  Please also indicate whether or
not you believe that this document is ready to go to the IESG.  Silence
does NOT indicate consent.  Unless sufficient support is demonstrated on
the list, the documents will not be send to the IESG.

The last call will end in 3 weeks, on 12th September.

Pekka, Jonne & Bob

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
tsvwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg