Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp-13

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 03 October 2019 11:35 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6063712003F for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 04:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-yKSgFrTRR8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 04:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2D1B120091 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 04:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eggert.org (unknown [62.248.255.8]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B94340180; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:35:38 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from slate.eggert.org (Slate.eggert.org [172.19.235.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC0FD841F35; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:35:32 +0300 (EEST)
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <A3FB9E59-C9F4-46D4-8327-BCDECAD96E8C@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3FB3357D-E570-423D-85B4-0ABAC974C9F5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:35:32 +0300
In-Reply-To: <5D8509CA.7010206@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
To: Gorry Fairhust <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <5D8509CA.7010206@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-MailScanner-ID: EC0FD841F35.A2C43
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/ERasOTmXSpIPjTJVipV1bu5wJUc>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp-13
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:35:42 -0000

Hi,

it'll be nine years in November since the WG adopted this document, and almost 15 years since the first drafts were published. Isn't it time to abandon this effort?

Lars