[tsvwg] Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-02-20

Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Wed, 05 February 2020 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96C512008F for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:04:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xa_5-XUOma49 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:04:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0F6E12086D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id z16so2665331iod.11 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:04:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hmUXrDLNlF/Y4OfgplI4zUSMXoQlYKFIF6+UepipYnE=; b=quyhL/MWBKUZ79jqRBlh3dauCb5CEZfr0+lZOntR6b25LdwBJos2n+4fg86a+Q2oEV oKB1sHQOuWekhx2YV/p1P65zjOvblG80sUpjmAtpmEh8jxWDWPhQ9Oux/w/XFSRlOTJ1 jDkf1ArEcLe9k53xDq7UFOwdGaB8lRqvKETBX+Xg7aIHXwj/6LVFvzkWCNP5V8Pz9vcq 4ZAEcoT932y78QIXBRODPLX7+qacxqDqn/BJySn7yne+SbkfHtTY3r/JOXAR7oBsmUN1 YX4eXSLssQXG+WX25qgTeURdE9A/+4Z8t5zKxaW5zP1U4NZhkkRRZPvJ+9lPspmfvJlH ngag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hmUXrDLNlF/Y4OfgplI4zUSMXoQlYKFIF6+UepipYnE=; b=a26x2H+VkM5CpRcP7haFi2UNkJPYkgRuD34XU0b5XMJbq5LEzRtLyx23DhJdHyfJ9g AegD1J7dgc/ixjogq2aNlq/uzUvc5tLrfDtdnZu9U4C61AADVsZOKHqm/AyWsyQvsuKT BByXWDxWDCzKGqjIAXt2gYLL19YNUIVjGB8THo6jZ7ZrO/4Y6Qyb4jqNP6VzKMhWSlRn t6IU+M7fGYTIxV0dbMeIgEYKBeQJSwXTt8j9QDcoqm+npw+rFYB5QX5IJAOc4XrwuDEm w9DSaUeNikyuWE+zqjxE58lHoscfOQxkax6lbaB6GeN/JbRjXpsrZZpkuTQrEwItD+I1 8myg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKkZM2A8qLzd8DBO4d88qMNqGaN3rd+VvDJLhJnrsZcS6dSfgF 36rgt3BJ+cKii3/Je9SM5XkK2C7SK4QaqY8EbZQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxeP/D/VY3UE2Izz4EVSDYWMa4Q1lCB5yC52/bbwyzl9+ERuSQIIgWBGGLTQ4hmEKBlEmz6sNuswypQp/DLJZU=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8b03:: with SMTP id g3mr28189937iok.279.1580918648139; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:04:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:f462:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:04:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <88fce1c5-0922-2d46-8d38-ab63b8c5d039@mti-systems.com>
References: <158014090210.26587.12925021630999725769@ietfa.amsl.com> <88fce1c5-0922-2d46-8d38-ab63b8c5d039@mti-systems.com>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 20:04:07 +0400
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwQz=nKFREWCyUsc-o+DADmVqqYgmsha+9FjHwRLySEeLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000070f67b059dd64efc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/WO8PoOowRoTd68La2APvN9jggVE>
Subject: [tsvwg] Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-02-20
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:04:11 -0000

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:28 PM Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:

> In order to improve availability for the ADs and some others, would it be
> a large problem for anyone planning to participate if the time for this
> moves to one hour earlier?
>
> I'm in UTC+4. Will try to adjust.

>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting:
> 2020-02-20
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:01:42 -0800
> From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> CC: tsvwg@ietf.org
>
> The Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) Working Group will hold
> a virtual interim meeting on 2020-02-20 from 10:00 to 12:00
> America/New_York.
>
> Agenda:
> 1. Agenda bashing (chairs - 5 min)
> 2. Update on status and near-term plans for the set of L4S drafts (Bob? -
> 5 min)
> - Chair request: Think about adding an explicit "Open Issues / Future
> Work" type of section in the architecture draft to consolidate a list of
> things still being worked in the context of TCP Prague and/or caveats and
> unknowns people should be aware of when deploying this Experimental work.
> 3. Update on L4S & TCP Prague implementation, test, evaluation
> (Greg/Bob/Koen? - 15 min)
> 4. L4S Issues List Discussion (goal is to see if we can agree on what more
> needs to be done on each issue to suffice for Experimental/Informational
> RFCs):
> 4.1 Discuss status on (Bob - ~30 min):
> #16 on classic ECN interaction
> #21 CE codepoint semantics (closely related to #16)
> #20 ECT(1) codepoint usage
> 4.2 Discuss plans forward to address (Bob - ~15 min):
> #26 on admission control
> #27 on terminology
> #22 on deployment feasibility
> #24 on evaluation & testing results
> 4.3 (We will try to handle the issues below by mailing list prior to the
> meeting)
> If needed, discuss close-out of (~15 min):
> #25 on IPR
> #18 on loss detection in time-units
> #23 on implementation status
> #19 on the single codepoint
> #17 on FQ interaction 5. SCE Update (Morton/Heist/etc. - ~30 min)
>
>
> Information about remote participation:
> Remote participation information will be obtained at the time of approval.
> Plan to use IETF WebEx.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>