IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] L4S DSCP (was: L4S drafts: Next Steps)

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 30 March 2021 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FE33A133A for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kTySIQgLEoM for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2293E3A1338 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id j17so9051743qvo.13 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=yuu72EJuIrtqbbsvZe7MN2JM0j5Rxlj9vrA0sVhD1Pk=; b=CdmFM1MDLmNiJXbWHYf71rRJkxz3+rjGgL3SeGVGvlHCJzzxtEFR2xwPy3sJASpWwl ljwXop5OHRBqeI+JxNpfTJCIPCm+2aD/HYDIiCv8F7wu1HjMuWc+rl6HXIYc/+GUBtFY /TIMyMgmLEXFpTpBFuDpHmDxvl+dONm50AEiSDrC5h6bIPJNsZsWpWbqYsQwoavmnMcR Kr+beKmGxVpbVwys7w+M/S0ePGmRDCOk3clM5+T9x2sQhKDHlyHCgYYimD2QhXqJwD4B rhYPDS44gV20lR8MVGzERapdZm/SngHL2TPvC7zIh5E3e3ndsPEGqI+edbSRCjRwoxu3 I52w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=yuu72EJuIrtqbbsvZe7MN2JM0j5Rxlj9vrA0sVhD1Pk=; b=tAKnsDt58d1ZEIKMsPN+GLViJhyY7dPJfEGNTbAFiuLCsRG9h5yk8l2tJpPO9p/yge SD8GQlDHz58osMhaKG4/ebLpXeZBuhUNV9lFeFP3sl0awU3jmPAubH30w1X9xpCtQViS bGK0DTxtKto9baFOVSXJ4VxcWsXB3r113u9cZrh9nctisEzAZoo75sXrEfrG4QVMmDRn 5GjTrDj/sOrzMlRTztVLeRyqVfoHcD4uKJwjfQx1BVCqIwXYsHk/qIQdbaMS8oPmfyRL UlT+QOH5/FzlHbTVL73QeXHXXOXEnHpWhyjTyL2uzQ3EeS4iqCx1WvUMtDJLTf+4hw/v SonQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JkydCJSOs/83a5TPDYjGNx39qkyOvW12VyaPwpsCs+NCkDY1S XNtTMu+HPzPMSMNJ8iuk1UjY81xqviLA//7E
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwF2NGI/EvXYXVNimNAT9Ch55TFruEOcMln+vlbbx4dSUzLWggZ7KGmiG6AqqpH4RjZlI5UIA==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:52c2:: with SMTP id p2mr529673qvs.45.1617145976809; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (cpe-174-102-117-3.columbus.res.rr.com. [174.102.117.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g3sm273195qtx.80.2021.03.30.16.12.55 for <tsvwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <MN2PR19MB404527384A1B1DD9CFC2A3D983659@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <6f0ac4bf-bd1a-65cd-1d40-a97d4aa71aab@bobbriscoe.net> <7B4426F9-E1C5-4F88-A264-0D54C809D523@gmail.com> <d28a8ac1-83a3-d7b5-3106-80abdca8b5a7@bobbriscoe.net> <C05137C5-B972-4E8F-8B1A-3254A4BB9865@gmail.com> <fe9b72cc-62fa-1587-64b4-4ed8b0b32d5a@bobbriscoe.net> <712A4EA0-27AE-4037-9ED2-687A5A69689B@gmail.com> <55df6d38-9b6e-aa31-7731-35765675d8de@bobbriscoe.net> <97DD093D-3FF4-45BF-9881-160763BF13FF@gmail.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <b136740c-b413-ab20-615e-5476d207feb2@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 19:12:52 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <97DD093D-3FF4-45BF-9881-160763BF13FF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/eBTjLtW7CAu2AL76EFz1QTejcOs>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] L4S DSCP (was: L4S drafts: Next Steps)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 23:13:01 -0000

On 3/30/2021 6:41 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> Okay, so what mechanism do you propose to contain the L4S experiment to the participating networks?

I think the notion of a strong containment guarantee to participating 
networks that you mention is a bit extreme in contrast to just reducing 
the likelihood or severity of issues. There has been a lot of congestion 
control experimentation on Internet paths that strong containment has 
not been expected of.

I think the sense of the working group has been to take an approach of 
collecting and recommending reasonable measures to identify and avoid 
issues when experimenting with L4S.  This is mainly in Section 4 of the 
ops draft right now.  I have not understood the general working group 
direction to be asking for strong containment guarantees though, and I 
don't think that needs to be a goal.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email