Re: [Txauth] consensus call on WG name: "Authorization and Delegation"

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Sat, 16 May 2020 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1DE3A076F for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0P0QIbPHCjrG for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87343A076E for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id h4so4038782ljg.12 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZyDA2UJYOE6W/3numHj25E6a8grBSnL1RrmGDs1JWtg=; b=IJAsqSY2l4o0JIJ8fvxk+Picpm6mY68fwqpRUcTvG6YtZplVmh/Z3juO8ZsILDfK0g FG90tDgnpTjvspiVqWAJkr4+/6lzd4+WakYGAaieh7TljYRkfQYdejgaEVTjmx/TPR1N QcuRJuUkdxOtfuSq3UscSraimE8B5GpWTPYmN30Sbi79a2htUCZBZ21f56uD5+9CqLHr sryRKqFbLWW5psxxQGr15WfVU8MMgKdvjwRUPOo3Y42Bf1S/UkvDqIwEiv8H5UtBwbtC gmB6+bLPFxpRkjW6AbrI2irymtl5X/gk4+b/TfcgBg6cPiqV4VYvryCiPciDER9o80aj ck1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZyDA2UJYOE6W/3numHj25E6a8grBSnL1RrmGDs1JWtg=; b=KMyeUZ0cA1mlkbAus/2V7MSnh27mF05Ps9EoxguOQSTqoIoiPhidbdWt6O1CXGwepc rlEj1UufIHtEc12eHtOPfyUG6ayM/rKHE7NNxK1zBcOjJy5tbOA8LtPG235F9HDQRwGe FsbADIATNKW/BXxa/UFk8RVs3KcXLb8k9BZoqJR+iX/AH0yCrXK5abCL8vAIyK+E4vF7 fYld2iJWOsnJklA+CudXgZs0JTzOgX9klvwRcLNPgDnv0zFrJgT9OqzkIqHVisFLQIiM 5GHrVFiOXQAIrzgM/PpUCun7ldXJ5R+auefD6iH/DSUHmObyQQrHX+5GWs/cRP/8w29h 02ZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IqpMhVXaFgizXUQSOweMGP9NPgYnR8+1zXD5aGFk/hRAkj19S XUblfYvn19/anaY9cXCdd2L2X3hQPiYDeFKoj2Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpRuqq8QY+EFEMK2MCJCL8/tLzF6rukMWyzgZKNEkfsLxZAhr4quuECylE93ZrwHkGv9lilq7DwqFVFD1C27A=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b891:: with SMTP id r17mr3790424ljp.34.1589588283647; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD9ie-sCJ+Nf0QFZLUWqRo3MCibrO9eKUj3zj_3Y1zXdfWOugA@mail.gmail.com> <943EF8E5-6F25-4E2A-907B-1333ABA112F6@mit.edu> <CAD9ie-tDQDMpYFrQk9Mb-_Nof5aiJ6iLZDbTu0LX3_hwSCMDtg@mail.gmail.com> <e744a5fe268f4e2380db23a092da4fc7@cert.org> <85A51BAA-EF86-49F5-ABB4-C332AE82DEAA@mit.edu> <CAD9ie-unev887EeXxEMeikE1a7yeZX_gLzy_unUw+A4J72rJwg@mail.gmail.com> <dda938f116a24da5bab687431ff4e917@oc11expo18.exchange.mit.edu> <CAD9ie-uD4RRduLiWC4Z=i6L_kRVVOJ1Ekg_hptw5ca3XLzd9fQ@mail.gmail.com> <7a226b1f3dee47699131fb7752f3ef07@oc11expo18.exchange.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <7a226b1f3dee47699131fb7752f3ef07@oc11expo18.exchange.mit.edu>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 17:17:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-trfN_4Jh-zt75RKB8ywc1Grc8j_xRjWdDE-Yd1FormZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Cc: "txauth@ietf.org" <txauth@ietf.org>, "rdd@cert.org" <rdd@cert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc6c0e05a5b8dc95"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/OYKHep7AbpbRXmcWPj0GJcxZpL0>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] consensus call on WG name: "Authorization and Delegation"
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 00:18:08 -0000

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:18 PM Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote:

>  I hope that you can assume good intentions.
>

This is ironic given you made the following statements:


>
> As an aside, I'm also concerned that you would discount the results below
> when the decision to not use "transactional" was a much, much smaller
> sample and margin. And yet that decision seems set and done, since it was
> excluded from the poll options entirely.
>
> <snip>


> I think the results of the poll were pretty conclusive and it’s not an act
> of good faith for the chair to propose a poll and then throw out the
> results of that same poll and go with something of their own choosing
> instead.
>
> How are you sure that it’s one person stuffing the ballot box? For my
> part, I put two dots on the winning title and one dot each of three others.
> I had a couple different people contact me off-list and told me they’d put
> their five dots on Transmission of Authority. So I think it’s reasonable to
> believe that’s the actual result, without examining the logs myself.



ᐧ