Re: [Txauth] [EXTERNAL] consensus call on WG name: "Authorization and Delegation"

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Fri, 15 May 2020 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894FF3A07F6 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tgsxiRk789Ri for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81C823A0807 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id d21so3421041ljg.9 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=92wJ26yZx3C04uOrbVJ0tB4b9fZCY8JXjnYZMylfpRk=; b=qeirz6ReavG67EI745roDV4RGEyuKMFw9P3zHS/KeXnNV97WXOkf79Lb0+MuaOr12s YSBOK5NC9HyS2SQ48TwKvc5SOTVjofUfSoiWmpbvAeqo7yS779uSqGtn0bbM6bFMrQk/ SToSuMriUOzngebdMKZG0HNTjFd3Szx/8GBiMkgBVDS1O9SE4B+rGJCYcuznL231vhuI AnGzK2en7wpZQLnyB8W0uS6pQOkVUQhHPoBWFZGiQxFB9YvNEWm8eAhDazAP75dVp8VO zWpFumhdGS/4S8I4i90x+iYkkNmAWW1kiiRvlBWS1U7nwEzlNNkc6zcV6XScVy2dpfIr D8UQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=92wJ26yZx3C04uOrbVJ0tB4b9fZCY8JXjnYZMylfpRk=; b=Dte/YzbEC7MT8CPR/4Yew/b9YRyVTdmTdY7mtvLqeJzy/loqEdN9F15wuWg3YKyWuP 4+8rWujyHKVC6Xf0rNkHG+pvVSlPfrS6WrkZXgfbH6p5LCQLLzTsvymjoV3y+5GxyGUd BiTiQkVvCyLEvhXsK7EBg+Cx7CXiJaHXeDxED2ut59atbcNUAye5wDG7ZKZ5aCa4RKmy wk82ldWpblm9t7pOdcbOSNGhY73q5KHE8gIrmqMlSzo3jM4CfuCVbz6vKmbGd40ls+rQ TtT4yryDbJIvfpgl6oXoa1w4wV8rhc+FUOWBUtHfAVPD9JsxJzenXMQhozcj7qaSOOxw IvDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NGhyLcy9AlvrtUErm4SzPmnmX+1REgf8BhoNbScu9Fls4Pbk6 SLBDTUaGGLH7GQbg9HT5DXbQ2bJfevwB4JEsG7g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7dWVxA/aLYpU+7Ioqav9cw+DDum9d7Hijp0CaMciB5aoz25PQcBDpesYense8/9dsW5mJG1j/D5MD74Nb8+8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b0f:: with SMTP id u15mr3166318lji.272.1589570552502; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD9ie-sCJ+Nf0QFZLUWqRo3MCibrO9eKUj3zj_3Y1zXdfWOugA@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR00MB068678CBE1B1D951439545F9F5BD0@MN2PR00MB0686.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <33f92f3b-2d84-329c-c56a-ef9cf9504c67@gmail.com> <CAD9ie-tDKf0z9TGFjyLheJp7iS2V0bhAEzQr2U-9=E8jonbzMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKiOsZsnopuq7XyYQLsMDyJW4mprShrDPXWX-S7-wPZfds_J1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKiOsZsnopuq7XyYQLsMDyJW4mprShrDPXWX-S7-wPZfds_J1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:22:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-swy++AODgoLGA-560pBoQ13TWfvnAmDcXp7chM8Kmtfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Skaife <blue.ringed.octopus.guy@gmail.com>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000020a37c05a5b4bce1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/cSHer3PS8QNYiE-TVRi-2InLuYQ>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] [EXTERNAL] consensus call on WG name: "Authorization and Delegation"
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 19:22:38 -0000

The mail list is going to stay as "txauth" per our AD.

I'm suggesting "Authorization and Delegation" since that is somewhat
descriptive, but does not stand out in a way that it would cause confusion,
and omits "Transactional" that many thought did cause confusion.

So "txauth" won't stand for anything, similar to what most people know
about "oauth"



On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:17 PM David Skaife <
blue.ringed.octopus.guy@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Feels like we've already spent long enough on the name debate - so I'm
> hoping we can draw a line under it and get on with the real work :)
> What short name for the WG are proposing to go along with the
> "Authorization and Delegation" expanded name?
>
>
> Many thanks,
> David Skaife
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_7637864219235362750_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:02 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We have had the discussion on the list already if you take a look at the
>> archives.
>>
>> Also note that we are naming the WG, not the protocol.
>>
>> The name of the OAuth WG is "Web Authorization Protocol"
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:52 AM Jared L Jennings <
>> jaredljennings@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Makes sense.
>>>
>>> Why is OAuth 3.0 bad or not an option?
>>> On 5/15/20 13:49, Mike Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> -1.  "Authorization and Delegation" is so general as to be fairly
>>> meaningless.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’d much prefer Brian’s late proposal, which wasn’t included in the vote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>               Web Resource Authorization Collaboration (WRAC)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                                                        -- Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Txauth <txauth-bounces@ietf.org> <txauth-bounces@ietf.org> *On
>>> Behalf Of *Dick Hardt
>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2020 11:21 AM
>>> *To:* txauth@ietf.org
>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Txauth] consensus call on WG name:
>>> "Authorization and Delegation"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Following on from my email wrt. the results of voting, please indicate
>>> if you are aligned with calling the working group the "Authorization and
>>> Delegation" working group with a +1 or -1.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Txauth mailing list
>>> Txauth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>
>> --
>> Txauth mailing list
>> Txauth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>
>