Re: [Tzdist] Existing and new data ...

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 12 December 2014 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC251AC41F for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:22:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y4p4nBkBqlIi for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511B41AC42A for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:22:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1548; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1418372555; x=1419582155; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=6nSF1eC4Y7wBRwAx5EY1IwuFmMYjROCPRse6qx3qvec=; b=iK8UBSmkw0VYVntTqpNiAdgkJm6GLHjgP8V6iaTxl+qlieO0KTRC/J+6 QYXwXJF3SD1D4Eg6YpHbJXVCvZ0F7qQ4ciY1Zi+5EY9ys5NF4C2cJZgrn BJVtVBQVnoR56wx7Pxw7cLeKmbnU2SIDkveAMek35WW0O+SB9ERkyX+av 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAE+lilStJssW/2dsb2JhbABZhDCDBchmAoEqAQEBAQF9hA0BAQQjVRELGAkWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYBDAYCAQGIKMFAlioBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEbj3mCaIFBAQSPSYEnhX6FeYs6IoNtPTCCQwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,561,1413244800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="270656193"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Dec 2014 08:22:33 +0000
Received: from [10.61.164.153] ([10.61.164.153]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBC8MXlV029552; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:22:33 GMT
Message-ID: <548AA5CB.4040902@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:22:35 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>, tzdist@ietf.org
References: <54888642.1030108@lsces.co.uk> <F2F4FB8F282334E543F462B5@caldav.corp.apple.com> <54889270.7040801@lsces.co.uk> <5488942F.1060501@cs.ucla.edu> <86CD6E72C7C095D731E54BE5@caldav.corp.apple.com> <5488A162.3060407@cs.ucla.edu> <6AFD9D54654219E46157DEB2@caldav.corp.apple.com> <5489069E.1070804@cs.ucla.edu> <CAFF1901EACD5F5BB0E17C1E@caldav.corp.apple.com> <5489C062.3090708@lsces.co.uk> <CD5BEE7356938D65A1893932@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5BEE7356938D65A1893932@caldav.corp.apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r2SqLJpV5FiaqUuFOlfTcUkaTj64qb7eH"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/17MS_cNZq9dv8UwJrrVFH0AHe8E
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] Existing and new data ...
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:22:37 -0000

On 12/11/14, 5:28 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> Hi Lester,
>
> --On December 11, 2014 at 4:03:46 PM +0000 Lester Caine
> <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Essentially ONLY viewing
>> TZid's which have changed need to be flagged so only users who are
>> looking at an affected set of data need to worry if the 'latest' version
>> is later than that used by their cached data.
>
> OK, so my proposal is to include a publisher/version tuple in the list
> action time zone metadata.

What happens if the publisher doesn't publish a single database version
but instead versions the entries?


Eliot