IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tzdist] Time Zone Distribution Protocol WG Milestones (tzdist)

Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Wed, 13 August 2014 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725D71A0888 for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CsIGws5q6BHw for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (mail-we0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594E61A01AE for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w62so11468450wes.29 for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nhjDyEcnt8VJJJW3QR+PlARtYfpGm1RbFdqdZWNedS0=; b=B/sDx30qW4S5JgMCLVqLa4MgIWuTvzPqOMmq62iHHw/0ookLiSEPVo/VZNTzeNsAvX z23iHt+693KppCDxibBqBYLh+4xjW8rmaAfJ/TX6Bei3LmO77+FRZA7NrClFCfFfWInG xIg7FKX226yqBRs7oPuMlfovoamOeARp2Rj8UajchXhU/P0LLCZynZtNcPifR6ce5kza vUiUnL0xKQv4ngolw1ljnb2idRMNhIAYy2snTsFy5w9Ngm9OP8iBdW+DDGBZbGIJ6HXj uLJBoaVAc6WpSTVo/630CM1In5xIgPLhjSFgJqNWP4mpXoQABuBZ1UtfEJqZZro1Ck7j tqng==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn23bbcD5M6HOiC9jMc13KBrf8Jjd1OFb/qVqzrhJPCkkDcxIO8/ZAvKHhZ8bI8J+Y76KJo
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.71.11 with SMTP id q11mr4948507wju.33.1407943617914; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.80.131 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAGevbXmdoJaFzr+xuUwH092w6mrX6YWNArPP4+48NNsWb+Avw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADZyTk=Z_Tb4mqakiwUtTGCguoHscDO4cGafokpH=hVdLgEWRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAGevbXmdoJaFzr+xuUwH092w6mrX6YWNArPP4+48NNsWb+Avw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:26:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CANO7kWA_bT00h-v5LRCy=bYa2uzkssBDdhmQnr+YNn3S++hJaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
To: Tobias Conradi <tc@tobiasconradi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/hGOjDpeUZqKPbnOuRCpbHv3s9FI
Cc: apps-area@ietf.org, tzdist@ietf.org, "tz@iana.org mailing list" <tz@iana.org>, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] Time Zone Distribution Protocol WG Milestones (tzdist)
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:27:02 -0000

Tobias,

A draft's name is irrelevant. It will be gone once it gets published
as an RFC. Other than in the two drafts' names, "timezone" is absent
from the proposed milestone text so I don't see any terminology issue.

All,

My comments on the proposed milestones:

- I don't see the need for 2-3 months between WGLC and submission to
IESG. If issues are tracked tightly during the whole process
[RFC7282], WGLC becomes a formality and you can send to IESG right
away. In any case, I suggest removing the WGLC milestones: the "send
to IESG" milestones are sufficient.

- "September 2016 re-charter the WG": This should not be a milestone.
Rechartering is something that is done out of necessity in the present
moment, not something that a WG aims to do in the future. Not having
the milestone does not impact in any way the possibility of a
rechartering.

Simon


On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Tobias Conradi <tc@tobiasconradi.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
>> These are the milestones we propose. If you have any comments, please feel
>> free to post them before Tuesday August 19 so we can consider them.
>
> 2014-08-13 today
> 2014-08-19 the mentioned Tuesday
> = 6 days
>
> This seems rather short, see
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/current/msg00004.html
> 2014-07-03 proposal to Mr. Daboo to change "timezone" to "time zone"
>
> 2014-08-08 this change has been done for the WG name
>
> = 1 month, 5 days
>
> But simple renaming not yet done for the drafts mentioned in the charter
> --------------
> The working group will use the following drafts as initial input for its
> work:
> draft-douglass-timezone-service-11
> draft-daboo-caldav-timezone-ref-01
> --------------
>
> So, shall people use drafts with outdated terminology as basis for discussion?
>
> I prefer to fix the drafts ASAP so that their contents can be
> discussed using consistent terminology.
>
> --
> Tobias Conradi
> Rheinsberger Str. 18
> 10115 Berlin
> Germany
>
> http://tobiasconradi.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tzdist mailing list
> Tzdist@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email