Re: [Tzdist] Time Zone Distribution Protocol WG Milestones (tzdist)

[Daniel Migault <[e-mail]>]

Hi Simon,

Thanks for the feed back.

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Simon Perreault <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Tobias,
>
> A draft's name is irrelevant. It will be gone once it gets published
> as an RFC. Other than in the two drafts' names, "timezone" is absent
> from the proposed milestone text so I don't see any terminology issue.
>
> All,
>
> My comments on the proposed milestones:
>
> - I don't see the need for 2-3 months between WGLC and submission to
> IESG. If issues are tracked tightly during the whole process
> [RFC7282], WGLC becomes a formality and you can send to IESG right
> away. In any case, I suggest removing the WGLC milestones: the "send
> to IESG" milestones are sufficient.
>
> I got your point. The time between WGLC and IESG submission has been
provisioned in case some issues/comments are lately reported on the mailing
list. However we hope this should not happen and encourage people to
comment as soon as possible.


> - "September 2016 re-charter the WG": This should not be a milestone.
> Rechartering is something that is done out of necessity in the present
> moment, not something that a WG aims to do in the future. Not having
> the milestone does not impact in any way the possibility of a
> rechartering.
>
> I am also fine with that.

> Simon
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Tobias Conradi <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Migault <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> > ...
> >> These are the milestones we propose. If you have any comments, please
> feel
> >> free to post them before Tuesday August 19 so we can consider them.
> >
> > 2014-08-13 today
> > 2014-08-19 the mentioned Tuesday
> > = 6 days
> >
> > This seems rather short, see
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/current/msg00004.html
> > 2014-07-03 proposal to Mr. Daboo to change "timezone" to "time zone"
> >
> > 2014-08-08 this change has been done for the WG name
> >
> > = 1 month, 5 days
> >
> > But simple renaming not yet done for the drafts mentioned in the charter
> > --------------
> > The working group will use the following drafts as initial input for its
> > work:
> > draft-douglass-timezone-service-11
> > draft-daboo-caldav-timezone-ref-01
> > --------------
> >
> > So, shall people use drafts with outdated terminology as basis for
> discussion?
> >
> > I prefer to fix the drafts ASAP so that their contents can be
> > discussed using consistent terminology.
> >
> > --
> > Tobias Conradi
> > Rheinsberger Str. 18
> > 10115 Berlin
> > Germany
> >
> > http://tobiasconradi.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tzdist mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist
>



-- 
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
[phone]