Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Unwanted-trackers Digest, Vol 9, Issue 16

I fully support the  DULT charter initiative, but I worry that some with
business interests are losing interest due to the excessively long time the
development is taking.
At this point, it is months beyond what was expected by interested industry
members, and I am aware of at least one manufacturer who is readying
refunds for pre-orders taken mid-2023, unable to ship products according to
the schedule both Apple and Google agreed on because of Apple's reluctance
to do anything before the standard is set in stone, and Google honoring
their pledge to wait on Apple. "The end of 2023" has passed, and now it
increasingly looks like "by the end of 2024".

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 3:02 PM <unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org> wrote:

> Send Unwanted-trackers mailing list submissions to
>         unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         unwanted-trackers-owner@ietf.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Unwanted-trackers digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter (Shambavi (Sham))
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Shambavi (Sham)" <shambavik@google.com>
> To: rdd@cert.org
> Cc: unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:33:37 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT
> charter
> Hi Roman,
>
> Thank you, I am in support of the DULT charter.
>
> Best,
> Sham
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:03 PM <unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org>
> wrote:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
>> To: "unwanted-trackers@ietf.org" <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 02:41:51 +0000
>> Subject: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter
>> Hi!
>>
>> With the benefit of discussions at two BOFs at IETF 117 and 118, there
>> appears to be a strong consensus signal to form a WG around the topic of
>> Detecting Unwanted Location Trackers (DULT) [1].  There also appeared to a
>> critical mass of energy to do the work (write and review drafts).
>>
>> IETF 118 BOF identified critical charter changes that were needed to
>> refine the DULT scope [2].  In the weeks following the BoF, PRs have been
>> filed and merged against these open issues.  Conversation appears to have
>> subsided on the list.  I’d like to assess where we stand with a formal
>> consensus check on this revised charter. Please review
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dult/00-02/ (00-02) and
>> respond to the list by Thursday, Feb 1, 2024.
>>
>> ==[ consensus check question ]==
>>
>> Do you support the charter text? Or do you have objections or blocking
>> concerns (please describe what they might be and how you would propose
>> addressing the concern)?
>>
>> ==[ consensus check question ]==
>>
>> If you previously spoke up at the 117/118 BoFs, please repeat yourself
>> here.  The outcome of this consensus check will inform the next steps with
>> DULT.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman
>>
>> [1]
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/118/materials/minutes-118-dult-202311061200-00
>> [2]
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-trackers/mAIFv6ns5GGS79Uch3cj80uVa2U/
>>
> Unwanted-trackers mailing list
> Unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers
>