IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter

Cory Francis Myers <cfm@acm.org> Sun, 28 January 2024 01:34 UTC

Return-Path: <cfm@mail.mayfirst.org>
X-Original-To: unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A928C14F5F4 for <unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 17:34:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FvEjjoJ67xr7 for <unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 17:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from priority.relay.mayfirst.org (priority.relay.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E16C14F5E0 for <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 17:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from route.relay.mayfirst.org (route.relay.mayfirst.org [216.66.22.37]) by priority.relay.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TMv9c0q6Hz9sFy for <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 01:34:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from filter.mayfirst.org (mailfilter002.mayfirst.org [209.51.169.92]) by route.relay.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TMv9b743Lz6vNd; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 01:34:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from filter.mayfirst.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filter.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TMv9b4zP6z1x5t; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 01:34:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Language: en
X-Envelope-From: <cfm@mail.mayfirst.org>
Received: from mail.mayfirst.org (mailcf002.mayfirst.org [209.51.163.4]) by filter.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TMv9b4L5Jz1x5l; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 01:34:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mayfirst-Relay: priority
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 17:34:24 -0800
From: Cory Francis Myers <cfm@acm.org>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: "unwanted-trackers@ietf.org" <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <ZbWvIGbKSMc/HPEK@net>
References: <BN2P110MB11071ACC8C40B9E83F52BCAADC70A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="voQVKUH5lTJ20JJe"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB11071ACC8C40B9E83F52BCAADC70A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-trackers/yvWode4NNHnCvytCtK2G7nQ-SUk>
Subject: Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter
X-BeenThere: unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on detecting unwanted location trackers <unwanted-trackers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unwanted-trackers>, <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unwanted-trackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers>, <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 01:34:35 -0000

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 02:41:51AM +0000, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> ==[ consensus check question ]==
> 
> Do you support the charter text? Or do you have objections or blocking
> concerns (please describe what they might be and how you would propose
> addressing the concern)?

I support the charter text as of -00-03.


> ==[ consensus check question ]==
> 
> If you previously spoke up at the 117/118 BoFs, please repeat yourself
> here.  The outcome of this consensus check will inform the next steps
> with DULT.

Based on the two BoFs, I've filed the following two tickets for the
record:

1. <https://github.com/rdanyliw/ietf-dult/issues/1>, acknowledging that
   this diagram and its terminology were discussed at both BoFs but are
   not part of the charter text under consensus call; and

2. <https://github.com/bdetwiler/draft-detecting-unwanted-location-trackers/pull/174>,
   which I intend as a clarification, not a substantive change.

Neither is blocking.  :-)  Thanks to everyone who's working on this.


Sincerely,

Cory Myers.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email