IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter

Kris Shrishak <krisshrishak@protonmail.com> Fri, 02 February 2024 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <krisshrishak@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA47C14F69A for <unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 23:10:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-G8spI2lBj2 for <unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 23:10:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-4318.protonmail.ch (mail-4318.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84516C14F61A for <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 23:10:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1706857809; x=1707117009; bh=zwVeMxocHleY3l9xus8kUiUYqcrd4gLcmdADtmYEIhw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=GwEp6W1j8DkZ+nqj1giiCrizvlygA0Tb6kPUKbDBSsxJAT4flLNDaIzpWE8Ez7C+m EDKbXt32js5DpExrVemZgRk3ZYEyz49Ocuc/k6fv+902xm78ulAtCTDMlLvl2dqd8g 8ZCHISwnrTCfeiuXdpGZIctlS835nxuwnCxRvbw1FaZxxH37y3qODMT/fb6MbjVdZy D0xBOYYQZ7FW029z7N0zoP2F4oTlL2vL5rfXVgJfOBJMtL+vXNXsKtYyEzIpTzCI0J yGq+szb2bvJ/j1+fXKZYYn8UH2pRgjiuea6KMZs1ylKiYoHFiBXQnEkYIOUlJMzyHs 7cSiIdGRf2WRQ==
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 07:10:00 +0000
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
From: Kris Shrishak <krisshrishak@protonmail.com>
Cc: "unwanted-trackers@ietf.org" <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <VaaxnlzOu7_4lL8ZoXwxa0EkRhRGSCnTom4DJC-JJyLX_0hIYdZo4EdlnCakBF08WYt4IKxBAlTsjhpxQrYlXrAYhQzChCMLzDiXbyJd1uQ=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB11071ACC8C40B9E83F52BCAADC70A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <BN2P110MB11071ACC8C40B9E83F52BCAADC70A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Feedback-ID: 32154832:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-trackers/Pe61SJqPXa8RZ0sTFKYZJL41Qos>
Subject: Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter
X-BeenThere: unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on detecting unwanted location trackers <unwanted-trackers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unwanted-trackers>, <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unwanted-trackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers>, <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 07:10:15 -0000




Hi Roman,

I've reviewed the charter text (00-03) and support it.

Kris

On Friday, January 19th, 2024 at 3:41 AM, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> With the benefit of discussions at two BOFs at IETF 117 and 118, there appears to be a strong consensus signal to form a WG around the topic of Detecting Unwanted Location Trackers (DULT) [1]. There also appeared to a critical mass of energy to do the work (write and review drafts).
> 
> IETF 118 BOF identified critical charter changes that were needed to refine the DULT scope [2]. In the weeks following the BoF, PRs have been filed and merged against these open issues. Conversation appears to have subsided on the list. I’d like to assess where we stand with a formal consensus check on this revised charter. Please review https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dult/00-02/ (00-02) and respond to the list by Thursday, Feb 1, 2024.
> 
> ==[ consensus check question ]==
> 
> Do you support the charter text? Or do you have objections or blocking concerns (please describe what they might be and how you would propose addressing the concern)?
> 
> ==[ consensus check question ]==
> 
> If you previously spoke up at the 117/118 BoFs, please repeat yourself here. The outcome of this consensus check will inform the next steps with DULT.
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/118/materials/minutes-118-dult-202311061200-00
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-trackers/mAIFv6ns5GGS79Uch3cj80uVa2U/
> --
> Unwanted-trackers mailing list
> Unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email