IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter

Siddika Parlak Polatkan <siddikap@google.com> Fri, 26 January 2024 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <siddikap@google.com>
X-Original-To: unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A23C14CF12 for <unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:08:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDwIUdo-lf-D for <unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:08:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA6EBC14CEFA for <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:08:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d5ce88b51cso62125ad.0 for <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:08:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1706310499; x=1706915299; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oPxJew5SWqWEc5L7khOZjh+Zzzgkajxp//pXAkMfZME=; b=B4OYB3yBTGXtrscRlstZvKrx8QSKIzSPDNqKe9EuZwdFJ5gHFPeFwtHGXK9tKPm8gV qHEn2903Gvy/G1HQO/lVIB4RFoEIl4FNTQ4WxJ/61cBMBde0hwrbb8qgV89LzSspBGcn ESNaHVw+dxcE7aqWS1NCiJdmKuEFV4T5eVyiqMOW79+fvsDuAMN73uqshU/M4vooLXjF gp1y9zMmmM+qCD4c5uTzubwGsktkh2SN867qvtFGPkMyyfWnKKkdBc4LcSoJ9kC6rdsM /8NpeLSf9RiROjSWCY+wdkIsIPK9gmlUpW3m3lFzw/UGtAHSgQI+k7HV0LE82+r9ppnF PBlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706310499; x=1706915299; h=cc:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oPxJew5SWqWEc5L7khOZjh+Zzzgkajxp//pXAkMfZME=; b=jZfnRFMk5z1JdXobpG5q7sG6K0yhUBEf3IxpOC0qDEyLd1sxSqB7VVBXGhqmtEH+aT 6ykG1G+jA0VeURsK5+eMsoojqFuEntlbAYAbkVbfODJc2IS9RB2QBqaKgYd2NOBtbnUe CTdUTxWx8ZoNGZsFWgqJfdxxY9FN9tYlTw3hLXY3bPP3X/nzBVQ3+GJX3oadCTTH86nX alF7I4n7njgkcqQcXxp2xSdcAMKAgUNgzQGXp5rYm+S8V6rbcD5h4frtSORvgswLPqXg RuXsKMz2kRmaBSQ/wbDKhyXTwR0vC9QgcOvnmcF+BrvmMtCuNsJ3ID9foWhE2/CgGFA1 hwRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyxtIoSp/jzQmb5QDbry+dvk0pp8x2eUXsxtdqnK1S/+bhnFPpo ZS8aeIcqMhvt2gPJb4zEoxxXZloSvd9jFtdyPvTZfL5dlw1luKQBOdwXeGC8LjXAOPOb0UM2b0r D58vySuvWHaFzVBuPKD9ouSInNiVmoWVyoEozQZGAHNSNhjlKoA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:cec9:b0:1d6:fc65:4633 with SMTP id d9-20020a170902cec900b001d6fc654633mt421309plg.25.1706310497999; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:08:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN2P110MB11071ACC8C40B9E83F52BCAADC70A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0E33E633-E4ED-4282-B8D3-8E80D233B03A@cert.org> <BN2P110MB1107CF8584A0CBDBFBDAB1C7DC7AA@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <2A74D265-021E-4AA4-9FC9-00D25F54AD2F@cert.org> <BN2P110MB110796995721DF3945342013DC7AA@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAPDSy+425DG1Z78mpLy3EVhGapU+7Woj5+3Nm54ORtG5HDNWQQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+425DG1Z78mpLy3EVhGapU+7Woj5+3Nm54ORtG5HDNWQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Siddika Parlak Polatkan <siddikap@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:08:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJKVKsiU0HEaJyL_=uF21F6z5eAEuNfg=NPM3nuBr2O3Dt6g5w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "unwanted-trackers@ietf.org" <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001e3b39060fe15f8b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-trackers/DxG6rfe4PaSeIrsElyNGQHP_TPs>
Subject: Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter
X-BeenThere: unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on detecting unwanted location trackers <unwanted-trackers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unwanted-trackers>, <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unwanted-trackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers>, <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 23:10:53 -0000

Hi, I am in support of the DULT charter. Thanks!


>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2024, at 9:41 PM, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless
>> you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> With the benefit of discussions at two BOFs at IETF 117 and 118, there
>> appears to be a strong consensus signal to form a WG around the topic of
>> Detecting Unwanted Location Trackers (DULT) [1].  There also appeared to a
>> critical mass of energy to do the work (write and review drafts).
>>
>> IETF 118 BOF identified critical charter changes that were needed to
>> refine the DULT scope [2].  In the weeks following the BoF, PRs have been
>> filed and merged against these open issues.  Conversation appears to have
>> subsided on the list.  I’d like to assess where we stand with a formal
>> consensus check on this revised charter. Please review
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dult/00-02/ (00-02) and
>> respond to the list by Thursday, Feb 1, 2024.
>>
>> ==[ consensus check question ]==
>>
>> Do you support the charter text? Or do you have objections or blocking
>> concerns (please describe what they might be and how you would propose
>> addressing the concern)?
>>
>> ==[ consensus check question ]==
>>
>> If you previously spoke up at the 117/118 BoFs, please repeat yourself
>> here.  The outcome of this consensus check will inform the next steps with
>> DULT.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman
>>
>> [1]
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/118/materials/minutes-118-dult-202311061200-00
>> [2]
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-trackers/mAIFv6ns5GGS79Uch3cj80uVa2U/
>> --
>> Unwanted-trackers mailing list
>> Unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers
>>
>>
>> --
>> Unwanted-trackers mailing list
>> Unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers
>>
> --
> Unwanted-trackers mailing list
> Unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email