Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter

[Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>]

Hi!

Thank you for the robust feedback on the mailing list.  I am closing this call for feedback.  I assess that we have rough consensus to start the chartering process of DULT.

The chartering process from here is a sequential process as follows:

** The IESG will conduct an initial review of the charter at the next formal telechat (February 15).

** The charter will be sent to the IETF community for review.

** The IESG will conduct a final review on the charter at a future formal telechat (possible dates include February 29 or March 7)

At each steps of this process, there may be feedback which requires adjudication.  Contingent entirely on the feedback during this steps, the current scheduling of reviews would make it possible for the DULT WG to be chartered by IETF 119.

Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 9:42 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [Unwanted-trackers] Call for consensus on proposed DULT charter
> 
> Hi!
> 
> With the benefit of discussions at two BOFs at IETF 117 and 118, there appears
> to be a strong consensus signal to form a WG around the topic of Detecting
> Unwanted Location Trackers (DULT) [1].  There also appeared to a critical mass
> of energy to do the work (write and review drafts).
> 
> IETF 118 BOF identified critical charter changes that were needed to refine the
> DULT scope [2].  In the weeks following the BoF, PRs have been filed and
> merged against these open issues.  Conversation appears to have subsided on
> the list.  I’d like to assess where we stand with a formal consensus check on this
> revised charter. Please review https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-
> dult/00-02/ (00-02) and respond to the list by Thursday, Feb 1, 2024.
> 
> ==[ consensus check question ]==
> 
> Do you support the charter text? Or do you have objections or blocking
> concerns (please describe what they might be and how you would propose
> addressing the concern)?
> 
> ==[ consensus check question ]==
> 
> If you previously spoke up at the 117/118 BoFs, please repeat yourself here.
> The outcome of this consensus check will inform the next steps with DULT.
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/118/materials/minutes-118-dult-
> 202311061200-00
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-
> trackers/mAIFv6ns5GGS79Uch3cj80uVa2U/