IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials

Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Tue, 22 September 2009 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <A.Hoenes@TR-Sys.de>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807C83A6A02 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.011
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.271, BAYES_05=-1.11, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kF1yHTqojMwv for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D036A3A6984 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA102520283; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:11:23 +0200
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id WAA02650; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:11:22 +0200 (MESZ)
From: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Message-Id: <200909222011.WAA02650@TR-Sys.de>
To: giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:11:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <D680C1DC5DB64EF58BCC312DC874D62B@POCZTOWIEC> from =?iso-8859-2?Q?K=F8i=B9tof_=AEelechovski?= at Sep "22, " 2009 "08:20:38" pm
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="hp-roman8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:10:58 -0000

> ...
>
> And change the baroque style of
>
> |  There has been in existence for some time a URN scheme of "urn:oid",
> |  but this is based entirely on numeric identification of each arc.
>
> To something simpler:
>
> |  The URN namespace "urn:oid" as defined in [insert a reference here]
> |  is based entirely on numeric identification of each arc.
>
> Regards,
> Chris

Fix-up, as per the IANA registry of URN Namespaces:

|  The URN namespace "urn:oid" as defined in [RFC3061] is based entirely
|  on numeric identification of each arc.

I have no idea to which degree that has been in actual use.

Regards,
  Alfred.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email