IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials

Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> Tue, 22 September 2009 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF913A6A17 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.009
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.377, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_PL=1.135, HOST_EQ_PL=1.95, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dta795OKx1dl for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shark.2a.pl (shark.2a.pl [195.117.102.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D1D3A696D for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av.2a.pl (av.2a.pl [195.117.102.9]) by shark.2a.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A032A6C19; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:20:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at 2a.pl
Received: from shark.2a.pl ([195.117.102.3]) by av.2a.pl (av.2a.pl [195.117.102.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8eklX1hDxac8; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:20:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from POCZTOWIEC (unknown [10.8.1.26]) by shark.2a.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 399162A6A93; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:20:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
To: 'Alfred HÎnes' <ah@TR-Sys.de>, j.larmouth@btinternet.com, olivier.dubuisson@orange-ftgroup.com
References: <200909221741.TAA01616@TR-Sys.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:20:38 +0200
Message-ID: <D680C1DC5DB64EF58BCC312DC874D62B@POCZTOWIEC>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
thread-index: Aco7rN6wZJJNQ7nkSiGpGqa5jkgYMQAA2Gig
In-Reply-To: <200909221741.TAA01616@TR-Sys.de>
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:19:36 -0000

The text below should probably be 

   This internet draft defines the IRI/URI scheme for International
   Object Identifiers.  The syntax and semantics of the IRI is specified
   below using the International Object Identifier tree specified in
|  ITU-T X.660: "International Object Identifiers".

And change the baroque style of

|  There has been in existence for some time a URN scheme of "urn:oid",
|  but this is based entirely on numeric identification of each arc.

To something simpler:

|  The URN namespace "urn:oid" as defined in [insert a reference here]
|  is based entirely on numeric identification of each arc.

Regards,
Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email