Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials
Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Sun, 11 October 2009 19:41 UTC
Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401E428C131 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.445, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KxxVSkdwjU6t for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com (mail-fx0-f228.google.com [209.85.220.228]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E76A28C12E for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so7130807fxm.42 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gz+dJOgjMObgMJASjWn2TdIyHB7EwxEHKmibkFEr2GM=; b=iWA6iemEcnVieDrAHKhP7AbksDd2aQtAKxtvQkuuWCy4FuJMpB1Dlrm4HhHrDjBu+O fYyfERahnlQ2J9/8w9hvIDDaeAz3yYFZTvLxcIcwTXF6boYmvPSFl+sv+sSs+ejnKteH VF58RehcV9SONucMbbw4jkqm86ivBfEcBxxRw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LPS4ggSqRazz9VQihUlCqjBMduNwP/3bpSd9CxKSq4p0rAQ3dkiscj36kbBn7Lq1Or 8RENZjUK/ptc/bCEsTPK+nsxqsijd8T3+2md5zJA5EwoMDRs21Wgx4Q8GlwET5/mhMi3 Xi4dvMrNuQldGDCcjZWm+Kx+q5L/psonR10Bo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.162.204 with SMTP id w12mr305624bkx.18.1255290112108; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4AD22269.10103@btinternet.com>
References: <200909222011.WAA02650@TR-Sys.de> <4AD1EEEA.2060506@btinternet.com> <e395be80910111039u76f6a88i844a87266b08815@mail.gmail.com> <4AD22269.10103@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:41:52 -0400
Message-ID: <e395be80910111241y26d96dd0p3bca125a9bf6691f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
To: j.larmouth@btinternet.com, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Alfred HÎnes <ah@tr-sys.de>, uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:41:57 -0000
Hi John, This is an informal answer - your mileage will certainly vary... To publish as an RFC, an appropriate IETF Area Director (Applications??) has to briefly review the document (1 month) and start an IETF Last Call (1 month). Then, the IETF AD has to take the document to the IESG for approval as an Informational RFC (several months). Then the RFC Editor has to publish it (four to twelve months). That is to say, a pretty long time. Cheers, - Ira Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG Blue Roof Music/High North Inc email: blueroofmusic@gmail.com winter: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 summer: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, John Larmouth <j.larmouth@btinternet.com> wrote: > Thanks for this Ira - I will go for "provisional". > > I guess I do not need to refer to Graham by name. > > Roughly how long would it take for this to get convered to "permanent" > (assuming that the "provisional" gets approved")? > > It seems to depend on it being conververted to a full RFC, which sometimes > seems to take a long time. What would be an optimistic and a pessimistic > estimate, assuming no major objections? > > (Just to help with our planning.) > > Thanks. > > John L > > Ira McDonald wrote: > > Hi John, > > The IANA Protocol Registries state that Graham Klyne is the current > Designated Expert for URI schemes. > > http://www.iana.org/protocols/ > > Note that RFC 4395 says: > > "In the case of a permanent registration request, the Designated Expert > may: > > o Accept the URI scheme name for permanent registration. > o Suggest provisional registration instead. > o Request IETF review and IESG approval; in the meanwhile, suggest > provisional registration." > > That last means "publish as an RFC", and has been the typical process > for permanent URI schemes for years now. > > Cheers, > - Ira > > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) > Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG > Blue Roof Music/High North Inc > email: blueroofmusic@gmail.com > winter: > 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 > 734-944-0094 > summer: > PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 > 906-494-2434 > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, John Larmouth > <j.larmouth@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > Alfred, Chris, > > Many thanks for all your help. > > You will see that I have now posted draft-larmouth-oid-iri-02 which > contains all the corrections you suggested, and there have been no further > comments on uri-review in the last couple of weeks.. > > It is now my intention to e-mail iana@iana.org (in accordance with RFC > 4395) to request IANA to register 'oid:' as a permanent URI scheme, > referencing draft-larmouth-oid-iri-02 (IANA considerations) for the > registration template. > > If anyone on this list has problems with that, please respond in the next > week. > I guess that the Designated Expert for the IANA requested Expert Review is > likely to be Alfred (who has been most active in reviewing earlier drafts), > and will hopefully have no problems in rapidly responding to that request > from IANA. > > I hope we can soon bring this to a conclusion. > > Thank you. > > John L > > _______________________________________________ > Uri-review mailing list > Uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review > > > > > > -- > Prof John Larmouth > Larmouth T&PDS Ltd > (Training and Protocol Design Services Ltd) > 1 Blueberry Road > Bowdon j.larmouth@btinternet.com > Altrincham > Cheshire > WA14 3LS > England > Tel: +44 161 928 1605 >
- [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… John Larmouth
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Ira McDonald
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… John Larmouth
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Ira McDonald
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-02 Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… John Larmouth