Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials
David Booth <david@dbooth.org> Mon, 12 October 2009 17:16 UTC
Return-Path: <david@dbooth.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5173A67D9 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.930, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6nJwxshvcpSP for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FF143A67A1 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 63790 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 17:16:11 -0000
Received: from 209.6.102.232 (HELO ?192.168.7.2?) (209.6.102.232) by relay03.pair.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 17:16:11 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.197.102.232
From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
To: j.larmouth@btinternet.com
In-Reply-To: <4AD1EEEA.2060506@btinternet.com>
References: <200909222011.WAA02650@TR-Sys.de> <4AD1EEEA.2060506@btinternet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:16:10 -0400
Message-Id: <1255367770.5481.8489.camel@dbooth-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alfred HÎnes <ah@TR-Sys.de>, uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:16:11 -0000
John, Why wouldn't an HTTP URI prefix be just as good or better for this purpose? The use of HTTP URI prefixes is described here: http://dbooth.org/2006/urn2http/ Note that HTTP URIs could dramatically improve the adoption rate for a new protocol, by resolving to a download of the protocol implementation software, as suggested by Graham Klyne: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2009Sep/0029.html David Booth On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:42 +0100, John Larmouth wrote: > Alfred, Chris, > > Many thanks for all your help. > > You will see that I have now posted draft-larmouth-oid-iri-02 which > contains all the corrections you suggested, and there have been no > further comments on uri-review in the last couple of weeks.. > > It is now my intention to e-mail iana@iana.org (in accordance with RFC > 4395) to request IANA to register 'oid:' as a permanent URI scheme, > referencing draft-larmouth-oid-iri-02 (IANA considerations) for the > registration template. > > If anyone on this list has problems with that, please respond in the > next week. > > I guess that the Designated Expert for the IANA requested Expert Review > is likely to be Alfred (who has been most active in reviewing earlier > drafts), and will hopefully have no problems in rapidly responding to > that request from IANA. > > I hope we can soon bring this to a conclusion. > > Thank you. > > John L > > _______________________________________________ > Uri-review mailing list > Uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review > > -- David Booth, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic (contractor) Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
- [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editorials Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… John Larmouth
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Ira McDonald
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… John Larmouth
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Ira McDonald
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-02 Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-larmouth-oid-iri-01 editor… John Larmouth