IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" URI scheme

bnewbold@robocracy.org Mon, 08 May 2023 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bnewbold@robocracy.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A48C14CE3B for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2023 00:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fh2DX_fEuTGO for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2023 00:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.robocracy.org (adze.robocracy.org [96.126.104.254]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D054CC14CE51 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2023 00:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from adze.robocracy.org (adze.robocracy.org [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:feb0:af1f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bnewbold) by mail.robocracy.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01CC49C85B; Mon, 8 May 2023 07:13:31 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 07:13:31 +0000
From: bnewbold@robocracy.org
To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, Bryan Newbold <bryan@blueskyweb.xyz>, Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com>, Devin Ivy <devin@blueskyweb.xyz>, Jay Graber <jay@blueskyweb.xyz>
In-Reply-To: <f0fd46bcb21649ccab1451d0af7c426e@nic.at>
Message-ID: <a831da8-43a1-9a8a-a0d4-5f766913d2fe@robocracy.org>
References: <f456a86-b079-2bec-f698-f2fc4fb7e76b@robocracy.org> <f0fd46bcb21649ccab1451d0af7c426e@nic.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/BRMeH5hCArW6UwvmKRVoVJVkSC4>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 07:13:42 -0000

Hi Alex,

A quick scan of the URI schema registry and top-level domains yields 
several matches. For example:

'ws': WebSocket and Western Samoa
'ar': Arweave (provisional) and Argentina
'mt': Matter protocol and Malta
'info'

I'm sure there are many more! Perl script left as an exercise to the 
reader.

--bryan

On Mon, 8 May 2023, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm Head of R&D at nic.at, the ccTLD Registry for the ".at" Top Level 
> Domain. I do understand that the DNS TLD space is disjunct from the URI 
> naming space, but i do want to point out that registration of URI 
> schemes with stringes identical to a well known, long-established TLD 
> might have potential for confusion between the two name spaces.
>
> I will review the proposal and come back with a more detailed analysis, 
> but for now i'd like to know if the URI scheme experts have considered 
> that case when a schema string overlaps with an active Top-Level-Domain?
>
> Best,
> Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email