[Uri-review] Registration request for "at" URI scheme
bnewbold@robocracy.org Wed, 03 May 2023 03:03 UTC
Return-Path: <bnewbold@robocracy.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE0CC15155F for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2023 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Id2b6JLS7Hd for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2023 20:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.robocracy.org (adze.robocracy.org [96.126.104.254]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA53DC151556 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2023 20:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from adze.robocracy.org (adze.robocracy.org [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:feb0:af1f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bnewbold) by mail.robocracy.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C41879C85B; Wed, 3 May 2023 03:02:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 03:02:48 +0000
From: bnewbold@robocracy.org
To: uri-review@ietf.org
cc: Bryan Newbold <bryan@blueskyweb.xyz>, Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com>, Devin Ivy <devin@blueskyweb.xyz>, Jay Graber <jay@blueskyweb.xyz>
Message-ID: <f456a86-b079-2bec-f698-f2fc4fb7e76b@robocracy.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/x3LbUP7_DOlEFCH84QvZdRU74Js>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 May 2023 08:06:52 -0700
Subject: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 03:06:10 -0000
[re-trying from my personal email; original email was blocked as spam] Hi Folks! We are requesting a provisional registration of the "at" URI scheme, for use with the AT Protocol (atproto.com). Details are listed below. We do expect to add some additional constraints and small tweaks before formalizing the entire protocol, but we will maintain compatibility with existing URIs, and it seems prudent to register provisionally at this time. ------------- URI scheme name: at Status: provisional URI scheme syntax: at://<authority> at://<authority>/<path> at://<authority>/<path>#<fragment> URI scheme semantics: Reference a repository or record in the Authenticated Transfer Protocol (AT Protocol) Encoding considerations: Unknown, use with care. Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name: The Bluesky social network (https://bsky.app), running on top of AT Protocol Interoperability considerations: Unknown, use with care. Security considerations: Unknown, use with care Contact: - Bryan Newbold <bryan@blueskyweb.xyz> Change controller: - Bluesky PBLLC - Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com> References: "AT Protocol Overview" <https://atproto.com/guides/overview> "ATP URI Scheme" <https://atproto.com/specs/at-uri-scheme>
- [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" URI sc… bnewbold
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… bnewbold
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Tim Bray
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… bnewbold
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… bnewbold
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… bnewbold
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… bnewbold
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Tim Bray
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Paul Frazee
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Paul Frazee
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Melvin Carvalho
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… bnewbold
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… bnewbold
- Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for "at" UR… bnewbold