Re: [Uri-review] URI Scheme "ves:"

- Should you also register content-types for these things?
- Assuming you do, one wonders why you couldn't use regular old https URLs,
if these things are located on a DNS-addressable server.

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:06 PM Jim Zubov <jz@vesvault.com> wrote:

> Please consider the following provisional URI scheme for registration,
> any comments are welcome:
>
>    Scheme name:
>      ves
>
>    Status:
>      Provisional
>
>    Applications/protocols that use this scheme name:
>      A unique identifier of an end-to-end encrypted object stored
>      in VES Repository (https://ves.host/docs/repo).
>      The passphrases that unlock the VES keychains are managed
>      locally on the user devices by VESvault (https://vesvault.com),
>      applications can use open source libVES or an equivalent tool
>      to access VES Repository.
>
>    Contact:
>      Jim Zubov <jz@vesvault.com> <jz@vesvault.com> VESvault Corp
>
>    Change controller:
>      Jim Zubov <jz@vesvault.com> <jz@vesvault.com> VESvault Corp
>
>    References:
>      https://ves.host/assets/download/VES%20URI%20Scheme.pdf
>      https://ves.host/docs/repo
>      https://vesvault.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>