IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] URI Scheme "ves:"

Wade Benford <wade@soupsdeli.com> Tue, 21 December 2021 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <wade@soupsdeli.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABA43A1039 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:33:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, XPRIO=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5co53-AA8xR for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:32:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68A793A0ED6 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:32:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxusgaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.72.49]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M7IFk-1mEj5a2f14-00x7I1; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:32:56 +0100
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:32:56 -0500
From: Wade Benford <wade@soupsdeli.com>
To: Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <278362123.48801.1640100776158@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <0DF65AF6-6530-4949-A21D-45E00C6960A6@commercebyte.com>
References: <1174886867.22172.1640093277007@email.ionos.com> <F42C6667-6AF1-4382-941A-DE16D8C15428@commercebyte.com> <1693619625.16369.1640095542307@email.ionos.com> <213EECD8-8AD3-4723-9335-9B256146ABDC@commercebyte.com> <1523568480.20322.1640097911866@email.ionos.com> <69292463-950E-4379-81B0-CD4887B8E7C0@commercebyte.com> <28205083.56495.1640099497609@email.ionos.com> <0DF65AF6-6530-4949-A21D-45E00C6960A6@commercebyte.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev33
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:V8nYj66XrsJfv37zZaL3W1Gu2oALjA8GEk6XgAmD5B9x5mD1Jhf th3daF9tuIBubDrihkxr1qYVbTJgOiho0TaRVM7ZlMEDwta32awYEn3hRqLHYp/e1GSBF6R L+GS2LVndSNtW5tSmWK/VToWprK4yuPAVMttBVLQhLvjwQR2nP7LStJboYDTMg5o4Ky0uBr CMMB0Rsmb91VWvQ7dkcWA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:foziAAseJOY=:9dOt7rSq+w8jne69qrPG6i 5QzXOjYxHSDxuDV7h3R9jCmc4QPxMTyHHfvj6Mj8t1IGbd1uKfAwGUVj+Lp/fOHyr6u+41rLT qPDS3zXVLpyARinY/uCc0ZQD1iBTPVuFQk31JuXOk0AO+7bWKD4PtXBqMf9D9G4MsFjHuRaF9 2sCZ0lvs4Xv8ypCvRq37TY2TYY2FGeHs24q9AwFjq1GW2KucT2+makuTB5kSHExw7zboyLOnm H3wvEFykg0D7tDCsx+jftPoG1jAmL1AlIfiRPAP29Zo7r8AZ/7DZDjGpmUzijAN9hDd1U03lM 1QtQi3gZfMuLGesl3+wqmxscAsXv9VavP9WBlpBlJfRZeyGG8XIt8H/7zrBV2HRzuhvniw1Vx xGDvNYEd/5K8e846yjTjVwvMhi5vpAx0gQ77mOKLiJSUDkg+Kz2p1k+KL0z86ZeH5KCByJb8u JS+K3iUjdtWE+ekTWN8CFcJ05lT7r7A1CgGI2J+136OwUwJyQncPUGNBx1q9McLix3U3UdWh9 GqM0l28pfSTSmlYHsG1Kc2lhHYwV25FDZ7CWA+X6+PCSevS7Ve09Vxme5S169DqAQgS6KYVHi 77r25PQLTpVovm7QfShGclWLIYe3RiV5zFXk6inwc48ESo/X24gL3mHS1vF40EP2QewYI71fc s81RXPalZnOe5U1SUeS1QVITx8gBXFAJKXofAhMbGiUaBAofYmOKt5VLdkBsWChdLNvA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/oKfG4VtsVnGfPImpaGmCLMIQHJg>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] URI Scheme "ves:"
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:33:02 -0000

Ata boy Jim! Thats what I wanted to here. "A gross violation."
Although it strange to hear it coming from the guy who's specification explicitly states

"I purposely specified some permitted violations of URI syntax" 

But whatever.  Make it up as you go along, right Jim!  




> On 12/21/2021 10:15 AM Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> No, I believe it's a gross violation of the RFC to use the scheme name without ':'
> 
> 
> On December 21, 2021 10:11:37 AM EST, Wade Benford <wade@soupsdeli.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 12/21/2021 10:04 AM Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com> wrote:
> > > I just wanted to explicitly state that the separator characters, when unescaped, should never be treated as a part of improperly encoded path.
> > > 
> > 
> > So you won't ever use "ves#" instead of "ves:" right?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email