IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)

Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> Thu, 13 June 2013 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@adobe.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4239821F9B34 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ciLdKYiL4uCD for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og113.obsmtp.com (exprod6og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A1F21F9B33 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob113.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUbpRucr7Oak2sffOmloELbUsR0nS+Evp@postini.com; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:11:54 PDT
Received: from inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com (mail-321.pac.adobe.com [153.32.1.52]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r5DNBpAI023860 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r5DNBpw7024199 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.121]) with mapi; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:11:51 -0700
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
To: DataPacRat <datapacrat@gmail.com>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:11:50 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)
Thread-Index: Ac5oZeG1xmQopzVfR/q5TukSpG81WAAJT9Eg
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D3471E4101A@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
References: <CAB5WduCMF+HMyHPFU1bJkOcbzpyAM063XvCM-uDn2zGAoZkFEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB5WduCMF+HMyHPFU1bJkOcbzpyAM063XvCM-uDn2zGAoZkFEg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:12:05 -0000

" clear utility to the broad Internet community..."

If there is utility, it isn't clear.

You're packing lots of metadata irrelevant for locating into the locator.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email