Re: Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers (was Re: URL internationalization!)
"Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch> Wed, 26 February 1997 18:32 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa02128; 26 Feb 97 13:32 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18483; 26 Feb 97 13:32 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA07134 for uri-out; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:41:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA07129 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:41:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from josef.ifi.unizh.ch by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA11632 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Wed, 26 Feb 97 12:41:43 -0500
Received: from enoshima.ifi.unizh.ch by josef.ifi.unizh.ch with SMTP (PP) id <07792-0@josef.ifi.unizh.ch>; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:41:12 +0100
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:41:09 +0100
From: "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
To: Daniel LaLiberte <liberte@ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Cc: "Gregory J. Woodhouse" <gjw@wnetc.com>, uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers (was Re: URL internationalization!)
In-Reply-To: <199702241629.KAA04178@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.95q.970226183357.245S-100000@enoshima>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk
On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, Daniel LaLiberte wrote: > Gregory J. Woodhouse writes: > > I'm not so sure they are. True, existing applications use URLs like > > filenames, but then again, that's all we have. If there were no DNS, we > > would use IP addresses [...] > > Another way to describe this division is symbolic versus numeric > identifiers. URLs are already symbolic, and as such, they belong in > the column with filenames and domain names. Comming back to URL internationalization, I think the distinction between symbolic and numeric identifiers is a very useful one. One can see symbolic identifiers as things that mean something to the user, and numeric identifiers as things that don't mean anything to the user. [of course, there are numbers, such as 007, that mean something to many, but in general, they don't] Now ASCII identifiers can be highly symbolic for people used to the basic Latin alphabet. To others, who may have heard about them in school, but never much used them, these things will be highly "numeric". One core idea of URL internationalization is to allow to make URLs symbolic for those user groups that are mostly dealing with them (for the rare outsider, we have the "numeric" %HH fallback). Regards, Martin.
- URL internationalization! Martin J. Duerst
- URL internationalization! Martin J. Duerst
- Re: URL internationalization! Roy T. Fielding
- Re: URL internationalization! Gregory J. Woodhouse
- Re: URL internationalization! Francois Yergeau
- Re: URL internationalization! Martin J. Duerst
- Re: URL internationalization! Dan Oscarsson
- Re: URL internationalization! Alain LaBont/e'/
- Re: URL internationalization! Gregory J. Woodhouse
- Re: URL internationalization! Francois Yergeau
- Re: URL internationalization! Gregory J. Woodhouse
- Re: URL internationalization! Martin J. Duerst
- Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers (was Re: URL inte… Daniel LaLiberte
- Re: URL internationalization! Martin J. Duerst
- Re: Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers (was Re: URL … Gregory J. Woodhouse
- Re: URL internationalization! Dan Oscarsson
- Re: URL internationalization! Martin J. Duerst
- Re: URL internationalization! Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: URL internationalization! Larry Masinter
- Re: URL internationalization! Alain LaBont/e'/
- Re: Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers Daniel LaLiberte
- Re: URL internationalization! Martin J. Duerst
- Re: URL internationalization! Martin J. Duerst
- Re: Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers (was Re: URL … Martin J. Duerst
- Re: Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers (was Re: URL … Gavin Nicol