Re: Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers (was Re: URL internationalization!)

Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com> Thu, 27 February 1997 14:09 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa13870; 27 Feb 97 9:09 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11036; 27 Feb 97 9:09 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA10349 for uri-out; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 08:46:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA10344 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 08:46:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ebt-inc.ebt.com by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA18664 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Thu, 27 Feb 97 08:46:10 -0500
Received: from nathaniel.ebt (nathaniel [198.112.118.86]) by ebt-inc.ebt.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA17142; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 08:44:44 -0500
Received: by nathaniel.ebt (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id IAA24050; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 08:43:51 -0500
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 08:43:51 -0500
From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
Message-Id: <199702271343.IAA24050@nathaniel.ebt>
To: mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch
Cc: liberte@ncsa.uiuc.edu, gjw@wnetc.com, uri@bunyip.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.95q.970226183357.245S-100000@enoshima> (mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch)
Subject: Re: Symbolic vs Numeric identifiers (was Re: URL internationalization!)
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

>> Another way to describe this division is symbolic versus numeric
>> identifiers.  URLs are already symbolic, and as such, they belong in
>> the column with filenames and domain names.
>
>Comming back to URL internationalization, I think the distinction
>between symbolic and numeric identifiers is a very useful one.

Right. The fundamental argument here is whether URL's are supposed to
be completely opaque or not. Given current usage, it's awfully hard
to make a case for opaqueness... not that I think the opaque 
representation concept isn't useful: I think it's vital.