Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft
"Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu> Sat, 12 April 1997 23:43 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa17549; 12 Apr 97 19:43 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17242; 12 Apr 97 19:43 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA04221 for uri-out; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 19:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA04216 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 19:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from binky.ics.uci.edu by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA25365 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Sat, 12 Apr 97 19:25:02 -0400
Received: from paris.ics.uci.edu by binky.ics.uci.edu id aj17988; 11 Apr 97 16:38 PDT
Received: from kiwi.ics.uci.edu by paris.ics.uci.edu id aa29903; 11 Apr 97 14:52 PDT
To: "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
Cc: uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 1997 18:19:29 +0200." <Pine.SUN.3.96.970408105030.245J-100000@enoshima>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 14:52:34 -0700
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Message-Id: <9704111452.aa29903@paris.ics.uci.edu>
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk
>I reiterate that there is consensus on integrating text >for UTF-8 as the recomended character encoding into the >draft. That is a lie. >We have a proposed wording, two paragraphs which >I don't think I need to repeat. That is true. I wrote that wording because your prior wording was too confusing, not because I agreed with it. >I have only heard very >general arguments against this wording, arguments which >I have showed to be untrue or irrelevant. That is a lie. You have an opinion, Martin, and Larry has an opinion, and I have an opinion. You did not show any of my arguments to be untrue or irrelevent, and the only thing you have demonstrated is that you think URLs should be treated as filenames. Well, I disagree. The only question that matters is whether or not the draft as it currently exists is a valid representation of what the existing practice is and what the vendor community agrees is needed in the future to support interoperability. I have yet to hear *any* support for your additional requirements from the vendor community, and I know for a fact that they do not correspond to any existing plans of the Apache Group. Since it is my opinion that it is NEVER desirable to show a URL in the unencoded form given in Francois' examples, you cannot claim to hold anything even remotely like consensus. In fact, the "rough consensus" of the HTTP development community is that the URL namespace belongs to the origin of the name, and no client has the right or need to reinterpret that name for the purpose of display. That is what the current draft says, and it does so in a way that DOES NOT PREVENT any future use of URLs to be of a single character set encoding. IF you can persuade the creators of URLs to always use UTF-8, which is definitely not the case today (Apache, NCSA, and CERN servers all use whatever charset is used by the underlying filesystem, which on most Unix-based systems is iso-8859-1 or iso-2022-*), then you can make claims of consensus. Until then, your opinions have been answered to the best extent possible by the editors, and with far more civility than in your responses. ...Roy T. Fielding Department of Information & Computer Science (fielding@ics.uci.edu) University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3425 fax:+1(714)824-4056 http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/
- revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet dra… Larry Masinter
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Chris Newman
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Martin J. Duerst
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Edward Cherlin
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Larry Masinter
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Larry Masinter
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Chris Newman
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Martin J. Duerst
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Larry Masinter
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Edward Cherlin
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Larry Masinter
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Martin J. Duerst
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Larry Masinter
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: revised "generic syntax" and "data:" internet… Dan Oscarsson
- Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft Martin J. Duerst
- Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft Roy T. Fielding
- Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft Edward Cherlin
- Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft Harald.T.Alvestrand
- Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft Martin J. Duerst