Re: informal URN namespace identifiers
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 19 July 2011 21:44 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0155B22800F for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.713
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.713 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id krfigfMcweRQ for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492B2228006 for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-201.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.201]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D83C84005A; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:44:57 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4E25FAB0.5000603@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:44:16 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Mealling <michael@refactored-networks.com>
Subject: Re: informal URN namespace identifiers
References: <1fc2a9a5-bdf7-4a09-ba9f-4bfb853f9705@mail-1.01.com>
In-Reply-To: <1fc2a9a5-bdf7-4a09-ba9f-4bfb853f9705@mail-1.01.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>, Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>, urn-nid@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:44:19 -0000
OK, just asking. :) On 7/19/11 3:41 PM, Michael Mealling wrote: > +1 as well... > > If none are being requested I can't see it hurts that much to leave the file there... > > -MM > > P.S. Hi everyone! Yea, I'm still alive. Finishing up an MBA in December. Putting together a new space startup if all goes well... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Leslie Daigle"<leslie@thinkingcat.com> > To: "Ted Hardie"<ted.ietf@gmail.com> > Cc: urn-nid@ietf.org, "Michelle Cotton"<michelle.cotton@icann.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:34:56 PM > Subject: Re: informal URN namespace identifiers > > > +1 > > Leslie. > > On 7/19/11 5:31 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter@stpeter.im >> <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> wrote: >> >> The URN namespaces registry contains seven informal identifiers: >> >> http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-1 >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-1> >> http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-2 >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-2> >> http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-3 >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-3> >> http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-4 >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-4> >> http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-5 >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-5> >> http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-6 >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-6> >> http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-7 >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-7> >> >> As far as I can see, these informal identifiers were mostly intended >> for experimental use. In several cases, the registrations were >> incomplete, see for instance: >> >> "Registration date: TBD" >> "Declared registrant of the namespace: TBD" >> "Note to RFC editor: replace xxx with the assigned 3 numeric digit >> identifier." >> >> Do we know if these identifiers are in use? Is it worth the effort >> to clean up this part of the registry? >> >> >> Looking at the registrations, it seems that there were folks actually >> asserting their desire to use them at one time (1 might have been meant >> as an example, since Michael was heavily involved in the creation of the >> system; I can't tell there). >> >> But I'm not sure what you mean by "clean up" the registry. These >> numbers can't be re-used without breaking a fairly basic assumption of >> the URN system. Leaving the registrations there, even if incomplete, >> seems better to me than removing them and leaving unaccounted holes in >> the registry. >> >> regards, >> >> Ted >> >> >> Peter >> >> -- >> Peter Saint-Andre >> https://stpeter.im/
- Re: informal URN namespace identifiers Benja Fallenstein
- informal URN namespace identifiers Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: informal URN namespace identifiers Ted Hardie
- Re: informal URN namespace identifiers Leslie Daigle
- Re: informal URN namespace identifiers Michael Mealling
- Re: informal URN namespace identifiers Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: informal URN namespace identifiers Peter Saint-Andre