Re: informal URN namespace identifiers

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 19 July 2011 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0155B22800F for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.713
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.713 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id krfigfMcweRQ for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492B2228006 for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-201.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.201]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D83C84005A; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:44:57 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4E25FAB0.5000603@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:44:16 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Mealling <michael@refactored-networks.com>
Subject: Re: informal URN namespace identifiers
References: <1fc2a9a5-bdf7-4a09-ba9f-4bfb853f9705@mail-1.01.com>
In-Reply-To: <1fc2a9a5-bdf7-4a09-ba9f-4bfb853f9705@mail-1.01.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>, Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>, urn-nid@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:44:19 -0000

OK, just asking. :)

On 7/19/11 3:41 PM, Michael Mealling wrote:
> +1 as well...
>
> If none are being requested I can't see it hurts that much to leave the file there...
>
> -MM
>
> P.S.  Hi everyone! Yea, I'm still alive. Finishing up an MBA in December. Putting together a new space startup if all goes well...
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leslie Daigle"<leslie@thinkingcat.com>
> To: "Ted Hardie"<ted.ietf@gmail.com>
> Cc: urn-nid@ietf.org, "Michelle Cotton"<michelle.cotton@icann.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:34:56 PM
> Subject: Re: informal URN namespace identifiers
>
>
> +1
>
> Leslie.
>
> On 7/19/11 5:31 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter@stpeter.im
>> <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>>  wrote:
>>
>>      The URN namespaces registry contains seven informal identifiers:
>>
>>      http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-1
>>      <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-1>
>>      http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-2
>>      <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-2>
>>      http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-3
>>      <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-3>
>>      http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-4
>>      <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-4>
>>      http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-5
>>      <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-5>
>>      http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-6
>>      <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-6>
>>      http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-7
>>      <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-7>
>>
>>      As far as I can see, these informal identifiers were mostly intended
>>      for experimental use. In several cases, the registrations were
>>      incomplete, see for instance:
>>
>>      "Registration date: TBD"
>>      "Declared registrant of the namespace:  TBD"
>>      "Note to RFC editor: replace xxx with the assigned 3 numeric digit
>>      identifier."
>>
>>      Do we know if these identifiers are in use? Is it worth the effort
>>      to clean up this part of the registry?
>>
>>
>> Looking at the registrations, it seems that there were folks actually
>> asserting their desire to use them at one time (1 might have been meant
>> as an example, since Michael was heavily involved in the creation of the
>> system; I can't tell there).
>>
>> But I'm not sure what you mean by "clean up" the registry.  These
>> numbers can't be re-used without breaking a fairly basic assumption of
>> the URN system.  Leaving the registrations there, even if incomplete,
>> seems better to me than removing them and leaving unaccounted holes in
>> the registry.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Ted
>>
>>
>>      Peter
>>
>>      --
>>      Peter Saint-Andre
>>      https://stpeter.im/