Re: informal URN namespace identifiers

Michael Mealling <michael@refactored-networks.com> Tue, 19 July 2011 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@refactored-networks.com>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979A122800F for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id krmj-eCGXEPH for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-4.01.com (smtp-4.01.com [38.102.63.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77A5228006 for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-4.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177D25914B for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:41:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from smtp-4.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-4.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ef6AUG3DoYpB for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:41:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by smtp-4.01.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id E450A593BC; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:41:29 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-1.01.com (mail-1.01.com [38.102.63.171]) by smtp-4.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE535914B; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:41:29 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:41:29 -0500
From: Michael Mealling <michael@refactored-networks.com>
To: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
Subject: Re: informal URN namespace identifiers
Message-ID: <1fc2a9a5-bdf7-4a09-ba9f-4bfb853f9705@mail-1.01.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E25F880.3060909@thinkingcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [130.207.167.154]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.1_GA_3196 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/7.1.1_GA_3196)
Cc: urn-nid@ietf.org, Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:41:31 -0000

+1 as well...

If none are being requested I can't see it hurts that much to leave the file there...

-MM

P.S.  Hi everyone! Yea, I'm still alive. Finishing up an MBA in December. Putting together a new space startup if all goes well...



----- Original Message -----
From: "Leslie Daigle" <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
To: "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: urn-nid@ietf.org, "Michelle Cotton" <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:34:56 PM
Subject: Re: informal URN namespace identifiers


+1

Leslie.

On 7/19/11 5:31 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im
> <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> wrote:
>
>     The URN namespaces registry contains seven informal identifiers:
>
>     http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-1
>     <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-1>
>     http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-2
>     <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-2>
>     http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-3
>     <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-3>
>     http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-4
>     <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-4>
>     http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-5
>     <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-5>
>     http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-6
>     <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-6>
>     http://www.iana.org/__assignments/urn-informal/urn-7
>     <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-7>
>
>     As far as I can see, these informal identifiers were mostly intended
>     for experimental use. In several cases, the registrations were
>     incomplete, see for instance:
>
>     "Registration date: TBD"
>     "Declared registrant of the namespace:  TBD"
>     "Note to RFC editor: replace xxx with the assigned 3 numeric digit
>     identifier."
>
>     Do we know if these identifiers are in use? Is it worth the effort
>     to clean up this part of the registry?
>
>
> Looking at the registrations, it seems that there were folks actually
> asserting their desire to use them at one time (1 might have been meant
> as an example, since Michael was heavily involved in the creation of the
> system; I can't tell there).
>
> But I'm not sure what you mean by "clean up" the registry.  These
> numbers can't be re-used without breaking a fairly basic assumption of
> the URN system.  Leaving the registrations there, even if incomplete,
> seems better to me than removing them and leaving unaccounted holes in
> the registry.
>
> regards,
>
> Ted
>
>
>     Peter
>
>     --
>     Peter Saint-Andre
>     https://stpeter.im/
>
>
>

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
      Yours to discover."
                                 -- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------