IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] Registration request for urn:eris: namespace

Endo Renberg <ehmry@posteo.net> Fri, 06 October 2023 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ehmry@posteo.net>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B010C152561 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 01:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dh8xV2eAzcy0 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 01:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20FF2C151098 for <urn@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 01:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5C24240103 for <urn@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 10:27:56 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1696580876; bh=ce9xV6S/11+oB50HJLb45Z8NMfIC85bGQjUKFVKb6ic=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=CxYbaKK6u94vNEjTqVmY1L+JdNWaTPqe7DnHrWmomoUTy7M3jENCfrHMTWTd1lIPg KdLwDkGKnh3yy8VKp/c+sB/tNoakuBgSq0hNi2jkkjSGQUeZzXqjGef90u9f6xB9cD H6lOz/hFKKbbLgxJgNqvGJE1NKj0W79tntMAgauSmR6JC6h36RBBKVJ5WexJUa2NeY 2gpD0fpWNurGF6N/zY2d0vNO9kJ6Hb6PW9nX+TB4hFpRAzS+D6HUdAYNjNOAGtzCyp 2ePCuKWVUrZ/eh4/ZhbG5X3ta56Y5SGxkpuBcaHUw++Eu0FZpsiB8yVi0pVp9ac96a VzezdBsu8i+sw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4S21lJ24jwz6txt; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 10:27:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 08:27:53 +0000
From: Endo Renberg <ehmry@posteo.net>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Cc: urn@ietf.org
References: <87bkdeuszk.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <87bkdeuszk.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <1696580847.lzaphlltn5.astroid@garbage.none>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/npMe16uZ_I6R_hZ0H24V06f4tqM>
Subject: Re: [urn] Registration request for urn:eris: namespace
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 08:28:04 -0000

The registration request is withdrawn.

E.

Excerpts from Dale R. Worley's message of October 4, 2023 7:45 pm:
> Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> writes:
>> Dale, I think what you and I are saying is threefold:
>>
>> 1. URNs aren't a great fit for the Eris system as currently designed.
>>
>> 2. Although the Eris designers *might* want to modify their system to 
>> conform to URN requirements, that's their decision and we're by no means 
>> insisting on it.
>>
>> 3. However, absent such a redesign, it seems better to use something 
>> other than URNs in Eris.
> 
> Also, if it was clear the designers intended to revise the Eris scheme
> to meet the requirements of a global name system, I would accept a
> registration that made that clear but described only the "private use"
> subset of the future name system.
> 
> Dale
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email