Re: [urn] Request for oneM2M URN Namespace registration

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

The namespace is now registered:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml

On 11/15/22 6:13 PM, Miguel Angel Reina Ortega wrote:
> Dear Peter,
> 
> Thanks a lot for that!
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Miguel Angel Reina Ortega – Testing Expert
> Centre for Testing and Interoperability (CTI)
> ETSI ● www.etsi.org ● [e-mail]
> Phone: [phone] ● Mobile: [phone]
> 
> This email may contain confidential information and is intended for
> the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorized use may be unlawful.
> If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender
> immediately by using the reply facility in your email software.
> Thank you for your co-operation.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>
> Sent: 15 November 2022 19:39
> To: Miguel Angel Reina Ortega <[e-mail]>; Hakala, Juha E <[e-mail]>; Dale R. Worley <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [urn] Request for oneM2M URN Namespace registration
> 
> I've asked IANA to register this namespace and will report back when that task has been completed.
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 11/14/22 9:26 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Excellent, thank you. Sorry to have missed your updated version. I
>> will move forward on this with IANA.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On 11/14/22 4:12 AM, Miguel Angel Reina Ortega wrote:
>>> Dear Peter,
>>>
>>> I think that was the old RFC draft. I sent a new one that I think it
>>> solves all the issues you commented on.
>>>
>>> I am attaching them again.
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> Miguel Angel Reina Ortega – Testing Expert Centre for Testing and
>>> Interoperability (CTI) ETSI ● www.etsi.org ●
>>> [e-mail]
>>> Phone: [phone] ● Mobile: [phone]
>>>
>>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended for
>>> the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorized use may be unlawful.
>>> If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender
>>> immediately by using the reply facility in your email software.
>>> Thank you for your co-operation.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>
>>> Sent: 08 November 2022 21:50
>>> To: Miguel Angel Reina Ortega <[e-mail]>;
>>> Hakala, Juha E <[e-mail]>; Dale R. Worley
>>> <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: [e-mail]
>>> Subject: Re: [urn] Request for oneM2M URN Namespace registration
>>>
>>> Dear Miguel,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your note and my apologies about the delays you have
>>> experienced.
>>>
>>> I've just now looked at the expired Internet-Draft
>>> (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-fujimoto-urn-onem2m-01.txt)
>>> and I have a few comments.
>>>
>>> 1. The completed registration template follows RFC 2141, not RFC 8141.
>>> It should be updated to conform to RFC 8141 (see Appendix A for the
>>> new template).
>>>
>>> 2. https://www.onem2m.org/urn results in a 404 error.
>>>
>>> 3. Would it be possible to briefly clarify what is meant by "name
>>> models"?
>>>
>>> Once you have updated the Internet-Draft or just the template
>>> (because publication of an Internet-Draft or RFC is not required for
>>> registration of a URN namespace identifier), I will make sure that we
>>> complete the registration with IANA in a timely manner.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On 11/4/22 2:05 AM, Miguel Angel Reina Ortega wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> It's been a while now from this registration request, and I would
>>>> like to know the status of it as it appears not to be registered yet
>>>> (I cannot see it in
>>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml)
>>>>
>>>> Please, could you let me know about that? Or if anything else need
>>>> to be done from my side?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --
>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>> Miguel Angel Reina Ortega – Testing Expert Centre for Testing and
>>>> Interoperability (CTI) ETSI ? www.etsi.org ?
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Phone: [phone] ? Mobile: [phone]
>>>>
>>>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended for
>>>> the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorized use may be unlawful.
>>>> If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender
>>>> immediately by using the reply facility in your email software.
>>>> Thank you for your co-operation.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Miguel Angel Reina Ortega
>>>> Sent: 02 March 2022 18:17
>>>> To: Hakala, Juha E <[e-mail]>; Dale R. Worley
>>>> <[e-mail]>
>>>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Subject: RE: [urn] Request for oneM2M URN Namespace registration
>>>>
>>>> Dear Juha,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again so much for your comments. After discussion with oneM2M
>>>> delegates, q-component seems to be the most appropriate in our case.
>>>> We will accordingly update the syntax in case either several
>>>> parameters or only one can be used.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --
>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>> Miguel Angel Reina Ortega – Testing Expert Centre for Testing and
>>>> Interoperability (CTI) ETSI ? www.etsi.org ?
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Phone: [phone] ? Mobile: [phone]
>>>>
>>>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended for
>>>> the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorized use may be unlawful.
>>>> If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender
>>>> immediately by using the reply facility in your email software.
>>>> Thank you for your co-operation.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Hakala, Juha E <[e-mail]>
>>>> Sent: 02 March 2022 13:27
>>>> To: Miguel Angel Reina Ortega <[e-mail]>;
>>>> Dale R. Worley <[e-mail]>
>>>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Subject: VS: [urn] Request for oneM2M URN Namespace registration
>>>>
>>>> Dear Miguel,
>>>>
>>>> see comments below.
>>>>
>>>> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
>>>> Lähettäjä: Miguel Angel Reina Ortega
>>>> <[e-mail]>
>>>> Lähetetty: perjantai 25. helmikuuta 2022 18.55
>>>> Vastaanottaja: Hakala, Juha E <[e-mail]>; Dale R.
>>>> Worley <[e-mail]>
>>>> Kopio: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Aihe: RE: [urn] Request for oneM2M URN Namespace registration
>>>>
>>>> Dear Juha,
>>>>
>>>> I have discussed the issues with the oneM2M delegates and we have
>>>> updated the oneM2M URN namespace with the following:
>>>>
>>>> - General rule to limit NSS-restoftree to printable ASCII
>>>> characters, as you proposed.
>>>>
>>>> OK.
>>>>
>>>> - parameters for the MGMT URN namespace will be part of the
>>>> q-component, so starting with "?=" as should not be part of the URN
>>>> resolution. Please, advise if that's correct.
>>>>
>>>> I suggested r-component, but using the q-component (or even the
>>>> f-component) should be ok as well since your URNs will not be
>>>> actionable. The choice between these options is yours; what is
>>>> important is that the parameter can be separated from the nss string.
>>>>
>>>> Compared with the other two options, f-component has the benefit
>>>> that if against all odds at least some of the oneM2M URN should be
>>>> made actionable in the future, both q-component and r-component will
>>>> be available for that purpose.
>>>>
>>>> With q-component your URN syntax would then be
>>>>
>>>> urn:onem2m:<nss-root>:<nss-restoftree>?=<parameters>
>>>>
>>>> So for instance urn:onem2m:mgmt:nwkType:lora?=parameter1&parameter2
>>>>
>>>> If it is OK to have more than one parameter, you may want to specify
>>>> the character separating them (for instance, &). An easier solution
>>>> is to allow just one parameter at the time.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Juha
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --
>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>> Miguel Angel Reina Ortega - Testing Expert Centre for Testing and
>>>> Interoperability (CTI) ETSI ? www.etsi.org ?
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Phone: [phone] ? Mobile: [phone]
>>>>
>>>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended for
>>>> the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorized use may be unlawful.
>>>> If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender
>>>> immediately by using the reply facility in your email software.
>>>> Thank you for your co-operation.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Hakala, Juha E <[e-mail]>
>>>> Sent: 23 February 2022 08:57
>>>> To: Dale R. Worley <[e-mail]>; Miguel Angel Reina Ortega
>>>> <[e-mail]>
>>>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Subject: VS: [urn] Request for oneM2M URN Namespace registration
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
>>>> Lähettäjä: urn <[e-mail]> Puolesta Dale R. Worley
>>>> Lähetetty: keskiviikko 23. helmikuuta 2022 4.28
>>>> Vastaanottaja: Miguel Angel Reina Ortega
>>>> <MiguelAngel.ReinaOrtega=[e-mail]>
>>>> Kopio: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> Aihe: Re: [urn] Request for oneM2M URN Namespace registration
>>>>
>>>> As ETSI is a recognized standards body, we should fast-track this.
>>>>
>>>> + 1.
>>>>
>>>> Also, there's little specific information to review.
>>>>
>>>> Subtree registration page
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.onem2m.org/index.php?title=OneM2M_URN_Namespace
>>>>
>>>> provides additional information about oneM2M URNs, but there are
>>>> some gaps.
>>>>
>>>> Namespace specific strings will consist of two parts:
>>>>
>>>> <nss-root>:<nss-restoftree>
>>>>
>>>> Character set of nss-root is specified as a-z, A-Z, 0-9, but nothing
>>>> is said about the character set of nss-restoftree. I suppose you
>>>> could limit it to printable ASCII characters, in order to eliminate
>>>> the impact of Unicode confusables.
>>>>
>>>>     Within nss-root MGMT, the nss-restoftree will have the following
>>>> structure:
>>>>
>>>> urn:onem2m:mgmt.:nwkType:<identifier>:[<parameters>]
>>>>
>>>> I suppose the dot after mgmt is an error. If so, we get URNs like:
>>>>
>>>> urn:onem2m:mgmt:nwkType:lora or
>>>> urn:onem2m:mgmt:nwkType:ansi_c_12:parameter
>>>>
>>>> Within nss-restoftree colon has two different roles in the mgmt
>>>> sub-namespace. It separates both nwkType from identifier and
>>>> identifier from parameter (if any). This might create confusion
>>>> regarding the role of the parameter, since nothing in the URN syntax
>>>> says that the parameter is not part of the identifier. And if in the
>>>> future you need to sub-divide nwkType, it might no longer be obvious
>>>> for someone who does not know the syntax already where the
>>>> identifier is and whether there is a parameter.
>>>>
>>>> Since onem2m parameters will not have a role in identification, you
>>>> might be better off including them as URN R-components. Since your
>>>> URNs will not be resolved, this should not be problematic in any way.
>>>>
>>>> URN namespace registrations do not need to be RFCs. An RFC can be
>>>> provided if the identifier system has not been specified elsewhere,
>>>> and it is considered useful to create an RFC for this purpose (see
>>>> e.g. RFC 8458; https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8458) In
>>>> your case, I do not think that RFC is required or even justified. It
>>>> will be easier both for you and IETF if you send us just a template
>>>> as specified in RFC 8141. All registrations published as such
>>>> templates are listed at
>>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml.
>>>>
>>>> ETSI has already made one namespace registration as a template,
>>>> available at https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/etsi.
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>>
>>>> Juha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would recommend that the registration template specify how the
>>>> NSSs are to be compared, although looking at RFC 8141, it doesn't
>>>> seem to be required.  (It used to be that specifying the comparison
>>>> rule was
>>>> important.)  I suspect that oneM2M intends to use case-sensitive
>>>> comparison and largely assign NSSs in a single case.
>>>>
>>>> Dale
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> urn mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> urn mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>>>
>>
>