IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [V3] Gateway new to old

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Mon, 30 March 2020 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: v3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55B23A083F for <v3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Yx2rTAvlv9H for <v3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp68.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (smtp68.ord1d.emailsrvr.com [184.106.54.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41D1D3A0831 for <v3@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp17.relay.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id 303EB202B3; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:42:30 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from [10.1.3.91] (S0106004268479ae3.cg.shawcable.net [50.66.148.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.7.12); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:42:30 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_35E70BE7-8B15-430D-B534-AD6EE2060C27"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <A1A23A18-4D5B-4019-9378-F42173FC5EDF@csperkins.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:42:29 -0600
Cc: Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v3@ietf.org" <v3@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E5143CA5-531C-4F6A-9088-D007F3963541@iii.ca>
References: <3595789d7a8d24671250e2ca04fcf78eb04179a4.camel@ericsson.com> <EFF58041-128E-42F6-9303-A058A5A02E22@iii.ca> <CAOJ7v-3x=MHUzqwSeXnkAveJ2vEvp6OS1_OTQvOARrnnmFC6fg@mail.gmail.com> <A1A23A18-4D5B-4019-9378-F42173FC5EDF@csperkins.org>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
X-Classification-ID: 44aef7a2-4377-4f96-a049-6ec15697d7a8-1-1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v3/NlJUtIac9lJkjS9uHfIGhUXKTUM>
Subject: Re: [V3] Gateway new to old
X-BeenThere: v3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <v3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v3>, <mailto:v3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v3/>
List-Post: <mailto:v3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v3>, <mailto:v3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:42:33 -0000


> On Mar 29, 2020, at 4:05 PM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
> 
> It may be a reasonable goal to aim to re-use RTP payload formats as the media packetisation within the new transport. That is, different headers and transport, but format the media content the same way.
> 
> Since payload format packetisation already all have registered media types this would make the media content easy to identify, and save a lot of work in re-defining packetisation schemes.
> 
> Colin
> 
> 

+1 on reusing the RTP payload formats. As Joerg points out they are a good design for what is needed here.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email