IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Wed, 15 October 2014 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAC11A1B74; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z6REXdMSOmW0; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:3100:a006:1::]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8617D1A01AA; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from global-hq.muada.nl (global-hq.muada.nl [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:8b5:bdfd:214d:a71:4d8c] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id s9FCfkIm054018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:41:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <543E6B66.5050803@inex.ie>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:43:45 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DBCB9765-01AD-4DB5-81BF-3A637FB93D34@muada.com>
References: <F5C06CAF-0AD2-4225-8EE7-FC72CE9913F0@muada.com> <543E6B66.5050803@inex.ie>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0k-WLk-I0ZtJQJYSYaILZCCk0eE
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:43:59 -0000

On 15 Oct 2014, at 14:41, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> wrote:

>> There seem to be two types of organizations that do this: geographically
>> dispersed ones that advertise subprefixes in different locations, such
>> as multinationals, and organizations with very independent subunits but
>> with more limited geographical scope, such as national governments.

> and organisations who have a requirement for traffic engineering, whether this requirement is real or imaginary - there are well known examples of each.

Right, we should probably add that.

Although I wouldn't expect an organization to deaggregate down to hundreds or thousands of more specifics just for traffic engineering.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email